February 09, 2026 02:29 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues | RG Kar scam twist: Court issues non-bailable warrant against whistle-blower Akhtar Ali | Court snub for Vijay: Madras HC rejects plea in ₹1.5 crore tax case | ‘We never said no’: Suryakumar Yadav says India ready for Pakistan clash at T20 World Cup | Supreme Court orders Mamata govt to clear pending dues | ‘India is free to buy oil from anyone’: Russia fires back at Trump’s crude deal claim | ‘Justice crying behind closed doors’: Mamata Banerjee slams ECI in Supreme Court, CJI Kant assures solution | Mummy, Papa, sorry: Three sisters jump to death after parents object to online gaming
Sri Lanka
Image: Pixabay

Former Sri Lankan defense counselor in UK wins case against LTTE protestors

| @indiablooms | Mar 20, 2021, at 11:17 pm

Sri Lankan Army Maj Gen Priyanka Fernando, former defense counselor at the Sri Lankan High Commission to the UK,  has won a case in a high court in the United Kingdom which overturned a conviction order of a lower court against him, reported Colombopage.

A Westminister Megistrates’ court in the UK had earlier convicted him for threatening gestures he had made towards a group of LTTE supporters in 2018. The LTTE supporters were protesting on 4 February 2018 when the incident happened. Though, he had been tried in absentia.

Quashing the judgment of the lower court, the high court acknowledged the diplomatic immunity of the former defense counselor and also asked the defendants, the Tamil protesters, to pay the cost to Maj Gen Fernando.

“The interpretation of the treaty should not be an exercise in ‘pedantic literalism’. It should be read in the context of its ‘object and purpose’” said the court in its judgment.

The court, in its order, also noted that a significant purpose of conferring diplomatic immunity of foreign diplomatic personnel in Britain is to ensure that British diplomatic personnel enjoy corresponding immunities elsewhere.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.