August 11, 2026 10:20 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jharkhand student protest turns tense: Water cannons, lathicharge after Assembly march barricades breached | ‘Mother tongue is as pure as one's mother’: Vijay-led Tamil Nadu government makes Tamil Thaai Vazhthu mandatory in big language push | Indian envoy Kwatra cites US, UK laws to counter ‘myths’ around FCRA Bill | Jharkhand students march to assembly today: JPSC row escalates despite govt action | ‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute

Afghanistan: UN rights chief reiterates call for stay in gang-rape case

| | Oct 08, 2014, at 03:58 pm
New York, Oct 8 (IBNS) The scheduled executions set for on Wednesday of five Afghans accused of armed robbery and gang rape is being criticized by the United Nations human rights chief, who on Tuesday reiterated his calls for a stay to allow a judicial review and ensure that the right to a fair trial is upheld.

Speaking to journalists in Geneva, the spokesperson for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Rupert Colville, on Tuesday  stressed that there was “no question this was an appalling crime, and we appreciate the fact that State authorities acted quickly to arrest individuals suspected of committing it.”

However, High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein wrote on 29 September to President Ashraf Ghani requesting to stay the executions, which had been signed by  Ghani’s predecessor, Hamid Karzai.

“The High Commissioner informed President Ghani, and Chief Executive Officer Abdullah Abdullah, that he has grave concerns that the legal process which led to these convictions failed to comply with national and international fair trial standards,”  Colville said.

He added that OHCHR has credible allegations that the convicted men were ill-treated while in pre-trial detention, denied adequate legal representation, and during the legal proceedings, which lasted only two “short trial hearings,” the legal basis for the prosecution was unclear.

“The High Commissioner stated his firm view that the proceedings of these cases not only risk denying adequate justice to both the victims of this terrible crime and the accused, but will also undermine efforts to strengthen the rule of law and administration of justice in Afghanistan,” his spokesperson said.

The High Commissioner called on  Ghani to refer the cases back to the courts “given the very serious due process concerns,” and also urged him to consider exercising his constitutional power to commute the death sentences to a suitable term of imprisonment.

In his letter, the High Commissioner highlighted that Afghanistan is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Deviations from the due process standards under article 14 of that treaty constitute a violation of the right to life.

In addition, subjecting detainees to ill-treatment and forcing them to make or sign a commission under duress violates both article 7 of the ICCPR prohibiting torture and inhuman, cruel or degrading treatment and article 14, paragraph 3 (g) prohibiting compulsion to testify against oneself or confess guilt.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.