May 20, 2026 11:06 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Twisha Sharma death mystery deepens as crucial evidence ‘not shared’ during autopsy: Report | Balcony Smiles, Colosseum Walks and ‘Melodi’ Magic: Modi-Meloni Chemistry Has The Internet Swooning Again | Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial | Left era ends in Kerala! V.D. Satheesan takes oath as CM after UDF’s massive comeback | Drone strike near UAE nuclear plant sparks panic—India calls it a ‘dangerous escalation' | Kathak to Garba: Indian diaspora stuns PM Modi with grand welcome in Amsterdam | ‘Geography or history’: Indian Army chief issues blunt warning to Pakistan over terror support | India, UAE ink key energy deals during Modi’s visit amid West Asia tensions | ‘There can be no better Bengal CM’: Mithun Chakraborty praises Suvendu Adhikari | PM Modi adviser Sanjeev Sanyal frontrunner for Bengal Finance Minister: Report

SC rejects Subrata Roy's plea for more time to deposit Rs 966.80 crore

| @indiablooms | Sep 12, 2017, at 04:56 am
New Delhi, Sept 11 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Monday rejected Sahara India's Chief Subrata Roy's petition for more time to deposit remaining Rs 966.80 crore out of Rs 1500 crore by Nov 11, media reports said.

The apex court has said that an extension of deadline will lead to 'travesty of justice'.

In fact, the court allowed the official liquidator to prepare for the scheduled auction of Sahara's Aamby Valley project.

The Sahara group has been engaged in a legal battle with SEBI since long for failing to refund billions of dollars to investors in a bond programme.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.