December 23, 2025 04:04 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Delhi erupts over lynching of Hindu man in Bangladesh; protest outside High Commission | Targeted killing sparks global outrage: American lawmakers condemn mob lynching of Hindu man in Bangladesh | Assam on a ‘powder keg’: Himanta Biswa Sarma flags demographic shift, Chicken’s Neck fears | Bangladesh on edge: Student leader shot as pre-poll violence deepens after Hadi killing | Historic deal sealed: India, New Zealand sign landmark Free Trade Agreement in record time | Supreme court snubs urgent plea to stop PMO’s chadar offering at Ajmer Sharif | Emergency landing drama: Air India flight heads back to Delhi after engine malfunction! | PM Modi slams ‘cut and commission’ TMC in virtual Taherpur address | US launches Operation Hawkeye Strike in Syria targeting ISIS after Americans killed | Horror on tracks: Rajdhani Express ploughs into elephant herd, eight killed in Assam

JNU: Students' counsel says criticism not sedition, Court reserves order

| | Mar 16, 2016, at 08:19 pm
New Delhi, Mar 16 (IBNS) The counsel of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya on Wednesday argued that criticism of government can't be termed as sedition, even as the Patiala House court reserved order on their bail plea for March 18.

Khalid and Bhattacharya have been in  judicial custody over controversial February 9 event where alleged "anti-national" slogans were raised.

Their counsel said that the students had surrendered voluntarily and quoted Delhi government's report that said the video was doctored.

The counsel said the perception in media and society is that Umar and Anirban did something wrong but that is matter of opinion not of law.

Meanwhile, a high-level inquiry committee of JNU said that provocative slogans including were raised at the JNU event by a group of masked outsiders.

Spelling more trouble for Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya, the inquiry committee  said that the duo facilitated entry of some outsiders into the campus.

The panel, in its report, stated that Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya were guilty of creating disharmony and spreading divisive tendencies among students.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.