December 09, 2025 03:03 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Race against time! Indian Navy sends four more warships to Cyclone Ditwah-hit Sri Lanka | $2 billion mega deal! HD Hyundai to build shipyard in Tamil Nadu — a game changer for India | After 8 years of legal drama, Malayalam actor Dileep acquitted in 2017 rape case — what really happened? | Centre imposes temporary fare caps as ticket prices defy gravity amid IndiGo meltdown | 'Action is coming': Aviation Minister blames IndiGo for countrywide air travel chaos | In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata

Greenpeace welcomes SC verdict cancelling coal block allocation

| | Aug 26, 2014, at 12:07 am
New Delhi, Aug 25 (IBNS) Greenpeace welcomed the Supreme Court order Monday that deemed all coal block allocations since 1993 as 'illegal' on grounds of arbitrariness, legal flaws lack of transparency, fairness and even application of mind.
Greenpeace said this verdict is of significant importance in sending a signal to the NDA regime that future mining decisions would have to also adhere to high levels of scrutiny.  
 
“Greenpeace has been pointing out that green clearances are not the hurdle for the delay in operationalisation of coal mines. Today’s Supreme Court order has shown that crony capitalism has lead to the handing out of coal with little application of mind or of a modicum of transparency and due process. This gives hope to activists calling for the application of law and due process on other legalities to do with mining clearances such as rights of forest dwelling communities,” said Arundhati Muthu, campaigner, Greenpeace India.
 
The SC called all allocations made by the screening committees as illegal. In case of Mahan coal block  (situated in Singrauli Madhya Pradesh and allocated in 2006) for instance, the coal ministry’s screening committee minutes and CAG documents state that the decision to allot Mahan jointly to Essar and Hindalco was taken at the 27th Screening Committee meeting on March 1, 2005. But the minutes of that meeting, obtained through an RTI, show that Essar was not favoured for Mahan.
 
“The Madhya Pradesh government initially lobbied hard to have the Mahan block allotted only to the state entity, Madhya Pradesh State Mineral Development Corporation Limited. However, when the Screening Committee decided to allot the block to Hindalco on the grounds that state entities were entitled to many blocks not available to private players, the MP government in a fishy quick turnaround then made the case for allotting the block only to Essar Power with completely new reasoning to justify this demand,” said Muthu.  
 
"Today’s SC order   talks about the MP government’s change in stance."
 
"This crony capitalism is still at play as the right of community members of over 50,000 people from 54 villages are being quashed in the region of Mahan.  The ultimate beneficiaries are Essar and Hindalco. We need to press the pause button on all new block allocations and forest clearances till the murky issue of allocations is impartially probed,” added Muthu.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.