May 19, 2026 10:13 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial | Left era ends in Kerala! V.D. Satheesan takes oath as CM after UDF’s massive comeback | Drone strike near UAE nuclear plant sparks panic—India calls it a ‘dangerous escalation' | Kathak to Garba: Indian diaspora stuns PM Modi with grand welcome in Amsterdam | ‘Geography or history’: Indian Army chief issues blunt warning to Pakistan over terror support | India, UAE ink key energy deals during Modi’s visit amid West Asia tensions | ‘There can be no better Bengal CM’: Mithun Chakraborty praises Suvendu Adhikari | PM Modi adviser Sanjeev Sanyal frontrunner for Bengal Finance Minister: Report | FIR against Abhishek Banerjee over ‘provocative speeches’ during West Bengal poll campaign | Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple

Govt sends back name of Uttarakhand Chief Justice for SC berth, CJI says it's okay

| @indiablooms | Apr 26, 2018, at 08:55 pm

New Delhi, Apr 26 (IBNS) :  In a move that sets the stage for a fresh political controversy, the Government has sent  back one of the two names recommended for promotion as Supreme Court judges, urging the collegium or group of five most senior judges to be "objective and fair", media reports said.

According to reports, the Government has urged the collegium to  reconsider their choice of Uttarakhand Chief Justice KM Joseph.

The move was decried by the Congress, but Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra said the Government was well within its jurisdiction to do so.

However,  appointment of  Indu Malhotra, the second name recommended by the top judges, was cleared on Wednesday.

. The appointment has come through three months after her name was recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium.

Malhotra will become the first woman lawyer to be elevated directly as a judge in the top court.

While Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has refused to comment, NDTV quoted top sources as saying that the Government  wants the Supreme Court collegium to "explain why (Justice Joseph) was appointed and chosen despite other judges being senior."

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram has accused the Government of punishing Justice Joseph for his decision to cancel central rule in Uttarakhand in 2016, a move that enabled the return of the Congress government of Harish Rawat.

"Is the Modi government above the law?" tweeted Mr Chidambaram, questioning whether the hold-up on Justice Thomas was because of "his state or his religion or his judgement in the Uttarakhand case".

Senior advocates Indira Jaising, CU Singh and Vikas Singh, representing the Supreme Court Bar Association, also claimed that the “unilateral” segregation of Joseph's name is a “direct attack” on the independence of the judiciary.

After senior advocate Indira  Jaising asked for staying the warrant of appointment issued in favour of Malhotra until the concerns are addressed, CJI Dipak Misra reportedly said :
"How do you know what the Government has done? If they have sent back a name for reconsideration, they are well within their rights to do so under constitution bench judgements."

"We will now examine it," CNN-News 18 quoted the CJI as saying.

Meanwhile, the central government, on Thursday, issued the notification to appoint Malhotra as a judge in the top court. She is likely to be sworn in on Friday or on Monday by the CJI.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.