April 14, 2026 06:56 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto
Bhopal Gas Tragedy

Bhopal Gas tragedy: Supreme Court dismisses govt's curative petition demanding additional compensation for victims

| @indiablooms | Mar 14, 2023, at 06:21 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court in its judgement on Tuesday dismissed a curative petition filed by the Centre demanding an additional compensation of more than Rs 7,000 Crore from Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) for the victims of 1984 Bhopal Gas Tragedy.

"The question of compensation can't be raked up three decades after the settlement," the bench of the five-judge Constitution bench on Tuesday said in its verdict.

The plea of the Union of India (UOI) is not maintainable in law and also lacked merits on the facts of this case, the Supreme Court said, in its judgement on Tuesday.

A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and also comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Abhay S Oka, Vikram Nath and JK Maheshwari, pronounced the verdict.

The Supreme Court in its verdict also noted that the responsibility was on the Union of India to make good the deficiency in the compensation.

The failure to take insurance policies is gross negligence on the part of the Union. It is UCC's allegation that Union and State did not detoxify the environment.

The Apex Court said that the Centre has itself earlier stated that the amount paid by UCC was sufficient to settle all the claims of the Bhopal gas tragedy victims and there was no merit in Centre's plea as Rs 50 crore of the amount still remains unutilised and it can be utilized for the same victims in this present case.

"A sum of Rs 50 crores lying with the RBI (Reserve Bank of India) shall be utilized by the Union of India to satisfy pending claims for the Bhopal gas tragedy victims of 1984," the Supreme Court said, in its verdict.

The government sought a re-examination of the apex court's February 14, 1989 judgment which had fixed compensation at USD 470 million, contending that the 1989 settlement was seriously impaired.

The contention of the Central government was that the compensation, determined in 1989, was arrived at on the basis of assumptions of truth unrelated to realities.

The Bhopal gas tragedy, touted as the world's worst industrial disaster, had claimed the lives of several thousand people after a deadly gas leaked from the Union Carbide India Limited pesticide plant on the intervening night of December 2 and 3, 1984.

The tragedy unfolded in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, when the highly dangerous and toxic gas, methyl isocyanate (MIC), escaped from the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) and resulted in the death of 5,295 human beings, injuries to almost 5,68,292 persons besides loss of livestock and loss of property of almost 5,478 persons.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.