October 06, 2026 09:30 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror | ‘Vote thief’ Gyanesh Kumar: Rahul Gandhi climbs barricade, waves Tricolour during explosive INDIA bloc protest | ‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror | ‘He should not have been flying’: JD Vance on Flydubai co-pilot | Israel was ready to shoot down Flydubai jet if it kept flying towards Tel Aviv: Reports | 'If law wasn't followed, we can undo it': Supreme Court's big warning on SIR process amid Gyanesh Kumar row | From TMC Rajya Sabha MP to BJP nominee in 6 months: Koel Mallick's stunning political U-turn | ‘Stomp on your head’: Omani flydubai co-pilot’s chilling posts on violence against women surface | Asian Games 2026: India beat Pakistan to clinch gold in men's cricket | flydubai cockpit attack: Deleted posts expose Omani co-pilot’s views on women, alleged extremist past
Epstein Files
(L-R) Jeffrey Epstein and Noam Chomsky. Photo: Wikipedia & Facebook/Epstein

Epstein Files bombshell: Noam Chomsky advised sex offender to brush off public fury

| @indiablooms | Feb 04, 2026, at 01:12 pm

Left-wing academic Noam Chomsky had advised convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to ignore public outrage and media scrutiny over allegations of sexual abuse, according to claims in the latest tranche of the so-called Epstein Files, media reports said.

Emails cited by The Telegraph suggest that Chomsky described the criticism Epstein faced in the press and public as a “nuisance” and advised him that the best course of action was to disregard it.

“… the horrible way you are being treated in the press and public. It’s painful to say, but I think the best way to proceed is to ignore it,” Chomsky wrote, as quoted by the newspaper, adding that responding publicly would only invite further attacks.

Chomsky further argued that public responses often fuel what he termed “venomous attacks,” many of which he claimed came from publicity seekers or individuals making unprovable accusations.

The emails also included Chomsky’s criticism of what he described as a climate of “hysteria” around abuse allegations, suggesting that even questioning a charge had become socially unacceptable. He wrote that for many observers, the reaction was often “where there’s smoke there’s fire.”

The claims have surfaced amid the US Justice Department’s release of more than three million pages of investigative material related to Epstein, including documents, photographs, and videos. Officials said additional time was needed to redact sensitive information to protect victims, even though the statutory deadline for release was December 19, 2025.

Democrats have accused the department of withholding further documents, claiming the total volume of records may be closer to six million pages.

The document release has reignited political controversy in the United States. While earlier efforts during the Trump administration reportedly resisted making public files that could link Epstein to powerful figures — including politicians, business leaders, royals, and celebrities — the newly released material has also renewed scrutiny of alleged links involving former US President Bill Clinton, billionaire Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and current US President Donald Trump. Inclusion in the documents does not imply wrongdoing.

Epstein, a wealthy financier, was convicted in 2008 in a sexual abuse case and was arrested again in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges involving minors. He died by suicide in a New York jail while awaiting trial, a death that fuelled widespread controversy and conspiracy theories.

At the centre of ongoing scrutiny are the Epstein Files — including court records, flight logs, contact lists, and unsealed civil lawsuit documents — whose gradual release has intensified questions over how Epstein allegedly operated for years and whether influential individuals were shielded from accountability.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.