October 10, 2026 10:51 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Undeclared Emer-GenZ': Shashi Tharoor slams Delhi curbs over CJP protests, calls internet shutdown 'most regressive' | ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’, ‘Inquilab Zindabad’: CJP leader Abhijeet Dipke dares Delhi Police to arrest him, says ‘We are not afraid’ | CJP protest crackdown? Abhijeet Dipke, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka detained from inside flight | Dhruv Rathee detained ahead of CJP protests against CEC Gyanesh Kumar as Delhi goes on high alert | ‘Restriction, not complete closure’: Supreme Court questions Delhi shutdown ahead of CJP protest | 'Unwarranted': India hits back at JD Vance over ‘indentured servants’ remark amid US Green Card crackdown | US targets Microsoft, Infosys, Tata in green card crackdown | ‘Bold and inventive’: Canadian poet Anne Carson wins 2026 Nobel Prize in Literature | ‘Attempt to destabilise world’s largest democracy’: 42 retired judges rally behind Gyanesh Kumar over ‘vote chori’ row | ‘Vote chor, gaddi chod’: Dhruv Rathee, Prakash Raj join Bengaluru protest against Gyanesh Kumar
AI
AI researcher believes the technology can even kill humanity within the next decade. Photo: Unsplash

Could AI kill all humans by 2036? Anthropic researcher says risk is above 10%

| @indiablooms | Sep 09, 2026, at 06:12 pm

A senior researcher at Anthropic has warned that he believes there is more than a 10% chance that artificial intelligence could kill all humans within the next decade.

Evan Hubinger, Alignment Science Lead at Anthropic, shared his assessment on X, writing: “We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade.”

Hubinger also raised concerns about the industry's preparedness to address the risks posed by increasingly powerful AI systems.

“I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to,” he wrote.

Who is Evan Hubinger?

Hubinger is currently an Alignment Science Lead at Anthropic. According to his X profile, he has previously worked with OpenAI, Google, Yelp and Ripple.

He made the remarks while responding to an X post by Jacob Coxon, who recently resigned from Anthropic.

Coxon had also raised concerns about the potential risks posed by advanced AI systems.

“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger,” Coxon wrote on X.

In a separate post, Coxon said he had resigned from Anthropic after spending three years conducting pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic.

“I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives,” he wrote.

Coxon also warned against underestimating the capabilities that future AI systems could develop.

“Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing,” he said.

The remarks have renewed debate over AI safety and the challenge of ensuring that increasingly capable artificial intelligence systems remain aligned with human interests.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.