September 23, 2026 09:00 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'When we win, we're tearing this down': MAGA activist's threat to 90-foot Hanuman statue in US sparks backlash | Delhi women's safety under spotlight: 17-year-old allegedly gang-raped near Kalkaji Mandir in fourth such incident in 10 days | India gets fresh push for permanent UNSC seat as 4 European nations back bid | IIT Bombay professor gets faculty backing after student death controversy; protests intensify over suspension | IIT Bombay protests erupt after student’s death; authorities meet students over 18 demands | Mithu Mukherjee, the vivacious 70s heroine with a flirtatious charm, passes away | Zelenskyy speaks to Trump, announces New York meeting amid Russia-Ukraine conflict | Italy PM Meloni announces big school plan: Burqa, hijab ban and cap on foreign students | Arvind Kejriwal, family ‘missing’ from Delhi voter list, claims Aam Aadmi Party | ‘No UPI above ₹2,000?’ Ghaziabad traders put up ‘cash only’ hoardings
Pakistan Lawyers Strike
File image of lawyers' protest in Pakistan, screengrabbed from Twitter video

Pakistan: Lawyers threaten strike

| @indiablooms | Jan 04, 2022, at 10:45 pm

Islamabad: The Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and other bar associations have threatened a boycott of all court proceedings if Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed doesn't postpone the elevation of Justice Ayesha A. Malik of the Lahore High Court to the Supreme Court.

The Judicial Commission of Pakistan was to hold a meeting on January 6. Justice Malik is the fourth in the seniority order of the Lahore High Court. If elected, she would become the first woman judge in Pakistan.

After a meeting held on Monday, PBC Vice Chairman Khushdil Khan and Executive Committee Chairman Muhammad Masood Chishti said in case the January 6 meeting was not axed, all bar associations would boycott all courts in the country, the Dawn reported on Tuesday.

Khan said the bar associations were not targeting Justice Malik for her gender.

“Our emphasis is only to the extent of respecting the seniority principle. Parliament should amend the Constitution and enhance the present strength of 17 judges in the Supreme Court by adding two or more women judges at the top," he said.

The nomination of Justice Malik violated the seniority principle, the lawyers said.

(With UNI inputs)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.