April 14, 2026 08:52 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto
Cash-For-Query
Photo courtesy: Verified Facebook profile of Mahua Moitra

TMC MP Mahua Moitra appears before Lok Sabha Ethics Committee in cash-for-query case probe

| @indiablooms | Nov 02, 2023, at 07:10 pm

Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra on Thursday appeared before the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee to attend the hearing on the cash-for-query case, media reports said.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey on October 15 accused Moitra, who is known for her fiery speeches in Parliament, of asking questions on businessman Gautam Adani in Parliament in exchange for money.

The TMC leader is also accused of compromising her Parliament login details.

Dubey, a three term MP from Jharkhand's Godda constituency, cited a letter from Moitra's "estranged partner" Jai Anant Dehadrai, a Supreme Court lawyer, in claiming that Moitra received bribes from businessman Darshan Hiranandani.

Amid the row, Moitra, an MP from West Bengal's Krishnanagar constituency, on Friday admitted she gave her Parliament login details to Hiranandani but refuted the bribery allegations.

She told India Today, "Someone in Darshan Hiranandani's office typed the question which I gave on the Parliament website. After putting the question, they would call me to inform and I would read all the questions in one go as I am always busy in my constituency.

"After putting the question, an OTP (one-time password) comes on my mobile phone. I would give that OTP and only then is the question submitted. So, the idea that Darshan would log in to my ID and put in questions of his own is ludicrous."

Speaking to the channel, Moitra said she received gifts in the form of "one scarf, a lipstick and eyeshadow" from Darshan, who was her "close personal friend".

"The only things I have received from Darshan as a close personal friend was one scarf for my birthday present three or four years ago, then he called from the Dubai airport asking if I wanted something.

"There is a brand called Bobbi Brown and he bought me a lipstick from the brand, and eye shadow," Moitra told the English news channel.

Parl Committees do not have jurisdiction to probe alleged criminality, says Mahua Moitra

In a letter to the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee chairperson, Moitra on Wednesday claimed such panels do not have the jurisdiction to investigate alleged criminality.

Moitra writes in the letter, "There is also the question of whether the Ethics Committee is the appropriate forum to examine allegations of alleged criminality.

"I wish to respectfully remind you that Parliamentary Committees do not have criminal jurisdiction and have no mandate to investigate alleged criminality. This can only be done by law enforcement agencies."

Moitra has also wished to cross-examine businessman Darshan Hiranandani, who accused the parliamentarian of taking questions from him to ask in the Lok Sabha.

She wrote, "I wish to place on record that in keeping with the principles of natural justice I wish to exercise my right to cross-examine Shri Hiranandani.

"I wish to place on record that I am requesting the Committee to answer in writing and place on record their decision to either allow or disallow such cross examination."

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.