December 05, 2025 01:30 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata | Sam Altman is betting big on India! OpenAI in advanced talks with Tata to build AI infrastructure | Government removes mandatory pre-installation of Sanchar Saathi App. Know all details | Calcutta HC overturns controversial Bengal job annulment — 32,000 teachers rejoice! | Bengal SIR shock: 1 lakh ‘deceased voters’ found in Kolkata North! | Massive twist in Bengal voter list: ‘Perfect’ 2,280 booths shrink to just 480 after probe! | ‘Red carpet for intruders?’: Supreme Court raps petitioner in Rohingya case | Sanchar Saathi app row: Scindia shuts down Congress' ‘snooping’ charge — here’s what he said | Layoff alert! Marketing giant Omnicom to slash 4,000 jobs and shut historic ad agencies after IPG takeover
Parliament
Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury brought a puppy to the Parliament on December 1, 2025. Photo: Screen-grab from X

New Delhi/IBNS: The Congress on Monday found itself at the centre of an unexpected row after party MP Renuka Chowdhury arrived at Parliament accompanied by a puppy.

The real controversy erupted when the Rajya Sabha MP compared the animal to lawmakers inside the House, remarking that “those who bite are inside the Parliament” — a comment the BJP said insulted MPs and the institution itself.

Chowdhury came to attend the Winter Session with the puppy in tow, though she soon sent it back home in her car.

Her unusual arrival prompted questions about parliamentary protocol.

Unfazed by the criticism, the Congress leader defended her actions, explaining that she had rescued the puppy moments earlier.

“What protocol? Is there any law? I saw the puppy near an accident site on my way here. Fearing it would be run over, I picked it up and brought it along. Then I sent it home,” she told reporters, questioning why anyone would object to saving an animal’s life.

However, she quickly shifted her focus to the government, saying, “Those who bite are sitting inside Parliament and running the government. Is there no issue with that? Yet if I rescue an animal, it becomes a controversy.”

Chowdhury also noted that she has adopted several stray dogs in the past.

The BJP was quick to respond, calling the episode a staged “drama” and accusing her of disrespecting Parliament.

Party spokesperson Shehzad Poonawala alleged that Chowdhury had effectively likened MPs and parliamentary staff to dogs.

“Renuka Chowdhury has insulted Parliament and its members. She brings a dog to Parliament and then says those who bite are inside — implying MPs, staff, everyone. This is not the first time; she has previously mocked Operation Mahadev and Operation Sindoor,” Poonawala said.

Echoing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s comments earlier in the day, he argued that the incident reflected the Congress’s preference for theatrics over constructive debate.

“The Congress doesn’t want discussion or dialogue. They want disruption, drama, confrontation. They don’t want policy, they want sloganeering,” he said.

Calling the incident the “true face” of the Congress, Poonawala accused the party of undermining constitutional institutions and prioritising family interests over national ones.

“This is a huge insult to Ambedkar’s Constitution. Renuka Chowdhury and the Congress should apologise,” he added.

The episode has become the latest flashpoint in escalating tensions between the BJP and the Congress, who later clashed inside Parliament over issues ranging from the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise to pollution.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.