April 14, 2026 06:14 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto

Supreme Court refuses to stay Sharjeel Imam's prosecution in sedition cases

| @indiablooms | Jun 19, 2020, at 05:16 pm

New Delhi/UNI:  The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay prosecution of JNU student Sharjeel Imam in sedition cases registered against him in five states for his alleged inflammatory speeches during anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

A two-member bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and V Ramasubramanian was hearing a plea filed by Imam seeking to club all FIRs filed against him.

The Top Court was informed that governments of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh have filed their counter affidavits on Imam's plea but no responses have been filed by Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh.

"We cannot pass interim orders without seeing the replies of other states," the bench said.

"Let counter affidavits be filed by Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in 2 weeks," the bench said and listed the matter for hearing after 3 weeks.

Earlier, senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Imam, contended that the court had on May 26, issued notice to Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Manipur & Arunachal Pradesh and Delhi seeking their respective detailed responses in the matter, which is still awaited.

Taking strong exception to Dave's assertion, the Uttar Pradesh government said it has already submitted its response to the Top Court.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said Delhi government's response is also ready and will be submitted by evening. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.