October 01, 2026 01:18 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Israel-bound flight lands in Saudi Arabia as pilots fight in cockpit, stabbing triggers hijack scare mid-air | Vimal ad row: SRK, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff respond to FDA notices, says Tukaram Mundhe | Vijay’s TVK expands to Bengal? Party breaks silence on Purba Bardhaman office | ‘This guy is a monster’: Trump’s hilarious praise for Sundar Pichai, Google CEO’s witty reply | Gyanesh Kumar row exposes INDIA bloc rift: DMK, AAP skip meet, Akhilesh sends representative | SIR row: Supreme Court to hear plea against CEC Gyanesh Kumar next week | Sambhal violence case: SC quashes key accused Mulla Afroz's NSA detention, slaps Rs 10 lakh cost on UP govt | Nandigram bypoll twist: Calcutta HC grants interim bail to Congress candidate Milan Pradhan till Oct 21 | Myanmar military airstrike horror: 49 killed, 58 injured as bombs hit crowded Rakhine market | Britain reopens refugee routes for Afghans, Palestinians as immigration and integration battle intensifies
Sedition Law

Supreme Court pauses controversial sedition law until review in historic verdict

| @indiablooms | May 11, 2022, at 07:24 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a historic judgement, the Supreme Court Wednesday paused colonial era's controversial sedition law until its review by the government, media reports said.

After the verdict, now hundreds who are charged under the law can now approach court for bail.

Responding to the pleas which challenged the law alleging its misuse in many cases, the top court said no new First Information Report (FIR) will be filed and all pending cases will be hold at a time the government reviews the Act. 

Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana said as quoted by NDTV, "It will be appropriate not to use this provision of law till further re-examination is over.

"We hope and expect that centre and state will desist from registering any FIR under 124 A (sedition law) or initiate proceeding under the same till re-examination is over."

"The Union of India is at liberty to pass directives to states to prevent misuse of the law," the CJI added. 

Though the government Monday announced its decision to review the law, it had argued that the Act should not be paused. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was representing the government, said as quoted by NDTV, "There has to be a layer of scrutiny, where a responsible officer is there to scrutinise the gravity of the situation and there of course would be judicial forums."

Welcoming the order, Congresss spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjewala, tweeted, "Speaking “truth to power” is not #Sedition but true Nationalism!.."

Calling the judgement "victory", Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra tweeted, "Supreme Court stays Sec 124A- no new cases can be filed, existing cases can apply for bail & release immediately.

"Thank you to my lawyer Sr. Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayan for his 1 pager which swung the day!"

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.