September 18, 2026 03:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi
India-US
A file image of Donald Trump and PM Narendra Modi. Photo: PIB

Studying all developments: India reacts to US Supreme Court's order on Trump's tariffs

| @indiablooms | Feb 21, 2026, at 05:47 pm

The Indian government on Saturday said it has taken note of the US Supreme Court’s ruling on tariffs and is closely studying the developments.

In a statement, the Ministry of  Commerce & Industry said: "We have noted the US Supreme Court judgement on tariffs yesterday. President Trump has also addressed a press conference in that regard."

The Ministry further said: "Some steps have been announced by the US Administration. We are studying all these developments for their implications."

Uncertainty prevails over how much India will ultimately pay in tariffs to the United States after the Trump administration suffered a major setback from the US Supreme Court over its reciprocal tariff policy, media reports said.

The US Supreme Court on Friday struck down US President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff measures, ruling that he exceeded his authority by imposing them under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

In a 6–3 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court held that the US Constitution grants Congress — not the president — the power to levy taxes and impose tariffs. The majority observed that if Congress had intended to give such authority to the president under IEEPA, it would have done so explicitly.

With the reciprocal tariffs struck down, India is expected to revert to the earlier tariff structure of 3.5 percent that existed before the sweeping measures were introduced last year.

However, shortly after the ruling — which Trump described as “outrageous” and a “disaster for US workers” — he announced fresh 10 percent tariffs on all countries, including India.

When asked specifically about tariffs on India, Trump said New Delhi would pay 18 percent as opposed to 0 percent for Washington under the recently signed trade agreement.

“Nothing changes, they’ll be paying tariffs, and we will not be paying tariffs. So, the deal with India is they pay tariffs. This is a reversal from what it used to be. I think Prime Minister Modi is a great gentleman, a great man, actually, but he was much smarter than the people that he was against in terms of the United States,” Trump was quoted as saying by The Times of India.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices joined three conservatives in the majority, while Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

Trump’s tariff measures had already generated more than $133 billion in revenue for the US Treasury, with potential long-term economic costs estimated at $3 trillion over the next decade, media reports said.

Several companies, including Costco, have moved court seeking refunds, underscoring the immediate legal and financial fallout of the ruling.

Analysts say the judgment reinforces the constitutional limits on presidential authority in economic policymaking and reaffirms Congress’s exclusive role in taxation and trade legislation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.