May 09, 2026 03:56 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Cloud over Tamil Nadu government formation as Governor asks Vijay to prove majority | 1 Year of Operation Sindoor: PM Modi says it showed India’s firm response to terror | ‘Larger conspiracy ahead of PM Modi’s visit’: BJP on killing of Suvendu Adhikari’s aide | ‘My car was on OLX for sale’: Siliguri owner says number plate used in Suvendu aide assassination may have been cloned online | ‘Pre-planned political assassination’: BJP’s Swapan Dasgupta on Suvendu aide’s killing | BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari's personal secretary shot dead in West Bengal's Madhyamgram | Mamata Banerjee to move Supreme Court against Bengal post-poll violence, refuses to quit | Who after Mamata in Bengal? Amit Shah to meet BJP MLA-elects ahead of May 9 oath | Vijay’s TVK seeks Congress, Left support after falling short of majority in Tamil Nadu | Jolt to TMC! Supreme Court rejects plea challenging central staff deployment at Bengal counting centres
Supreme Court | UP govt

'Stop it or we will': Supreme Court asks Yogi Adityanth govt to stop fining anti-CAA protesters

| @indiablooms | Feb 12, 2022, at 03:41 am

New DelhiIBNS: The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Uttar Pradesh government to stop recovering money for property damage caused during the 2019 anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests from those identified as protesters.

The apex court said it is giving one final opportunity to the state government to withdraw the proceedings against them or it will quash the same for being in violation of the law.

"You have to follow the due process under the law. Please examine this, we are giving one opportunity till February 18," the court said.

A bench of justices DY Chandrachud and Surya Kant said the Uttar Pradesh government has acted like a "complainant, adjudicator and prosecutor" in conducting the proceedings to attach the properties of the accused.

"Withdraw the proceedings or we will quash it for being in violation of the law laid down by this court," the bench said.

The apex court made the comments while hearing a plea filed by Parwaiz Arif Titu seeking quashing of notices sent to alleged protesters by the district administration for recovering losses caused by damage to public properties during the anti-CAA agitations in Uttar Pradesh.

The plea said the notices have been sent in an "arbitrary manner" and cited instances where a notice has been sent to a man who had died six years ago.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.