September 23, 2026 09:52 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
ECI breaks silence on SIR row: Poll body says all decisions were ‘unanimous’ despite differences | Gyanesh Kumar under fire: Opposition seeks CEC’s removal as SIR row explodes over report of 14 internal ECI objections | SIR row explodes: Report claims 14 objections by 2 Election Commissioners; Opposition demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's removal | IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid Sahil Wakode death controversy: Report | Narendra Modi's Canada visit confirmed: Carney eyes trade deal by year-end | 'When we win, we're tearing this down': MAGA activist's threat to 90-foot Hanuman statue in US sparks backlash | Delhi women's safety under spotlight: 17-year-old allegedly gang-raped near Kalkaji Mandir in fourth such incident in 10 days | India gets fresh push for permanent UNSC seat as 4 European nations back bid | IIT Bombay professor gets faculty backing after student death controversy; protests intensify over suspension | IIT Bombay protests erupt after student’s death; authorities meet students over 18 demands
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Petition in SC after 'hasty' demolition in Lucknow post high court's order

| @indiablooms | Mar 01, 2024, at 12:46 am

New Delhi: A special leave petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Wednesday challenging the demolition of commercial spaces in Lucknow's Akbar Nagar in a hurry soon after the Allahabad High Court dismissed the pleas of 24 occupants.

Hours after the high court order on Tuesday, the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) began the demolition process of the allegedly illegal establishments in the area, targeting shops and other commercial buildings along Ayodhya Road in Akbar Nagar.

On Wednesday morning, Senior Advocate S Muralidhar mentioned the matter before the Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, remonstrating against the haste with which the demolition was carried out immediately after the high court passed its order.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna pointed out that the special leave petition had not been placed before it and said it could not be considered at the moment.

Justice Khanna instructed that the plea be brought before the registrar general first for listing. Once listed, the matter would be taken up, the judge assured.

The occupants of the commercial spaces had approached the high court challenging the LDA's demolition orders.

The division bench of the high court comprising Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Om Prakash Shukla dismissing the petition stated that it found no reason to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioners.

The court's decision was based on the categorisation of the occupants into two groups: taxpayers and Below Poverty Line (BPL) cardholders.

The high court said the individuals had presented themselves as slum dwellers, failing to provide accurate information.

The court clarified that after a thorough review of the documents, it was evident that neither the petitioners were slum dwellers nor did their establishments fall within the designated slum area.

The matter pertains to a legal battle when residents of Akbar Nagar first approached the high court in December 2022 against the LDA's demolition orders.

The LDA had notified the entire area as river bed and cited construction on Kukrail's riverbed and banks as illegal.

(With UNI inputs)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.