September 30, 2026 08:24 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
SIR row: Supreme Court to hear plea against CEC Gyanesh Kumar next week | Sambhal violence case: SC quashes key accused Mulla Afroz's NSA detention, slaps Rs 10 lakh cost on UP govt | Nandigram bypoll twist: Calcutta HC grants interim bail to Congress candidate Milan Pradhan till Oct 21 | Myanmar military airstrike horror: 49 killed, 58 injured as bombs hit crowded Rakhine market | Britain reopens refugee routes for Afghans, Palestinians as immigration and integration battle intensifies | New York Times executive shot dead: Elderly in-laws arrested amid bitter family feud over his 'trans' identity | Vijay's TVK makes Bengal entry: First party office opens in Purba Bardhaman amid state's political shake-up | SRFTI clash erupts over ABGP event: Students allege assault; BJP calls it ‘ugly face of Leftists’ | 'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained
Reservation

Modi govt's reservation for poor constitutionally valid: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Nov 07, 2022, at 04:52 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Monday declared the Centre's 2019 decision to grant 10 percent quota in colleges and government jobs for poor or Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) does not violate the Constitution, media reports said.

The top court judges said the quota does not violate the Constitution considering the capping of 50 percent.

The reservation was launched by the Modi government months before the 2019 General Elections in the backdrop of a string of losses in the state elections.

The decision was almost instantly challenged in the top court.

The judgement was passed by 4:1 in favour of the government. 

Justice Ravindra Bhat, who had dissented, said as quoted by the media, "Economic destitution, economic backwardness is backbone of this amendment and on this account amendment is constitutionally indefeasible.

"However, excluding the classes such as Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes (OBC) is not constitutionally permissible."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.