September 28, 2026 05:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation
Madras HC
Image credit: UNI

Madras HC refuses interim order on AIADMK's Apr 16 emergency executive committee meet

| @indiablooms | Apr 13, 2023, at 01:13 am

Chennai/UNI: The Madras High Court Wednesday refused to pass any kind of interim order with regard to the April 16 Emergency Executive Committee meeting of the Opposition AIADMK, while stating the appeals against the July 11 last year General Council meeting will be taken up for final hearing as April 20 21 as decided earlier.

The party is likely to take key decisions on contesting the next month's assembly polls in Karnataka amid enrolling new members.

A division bench of justices R.Mahadevan and Mohammed Shaffiq said, there would not be any necessity for the court to pass interim orders since it goes without saying that any decision taken by the party would be subject to the outcome of the appeals filed by expelled leaders O. Panneerselvam, P.H.Manoj Pandian, R.Vaithilingam (all MLAs) and JCD Prabhakar against their expulsions from the party.

The judges also said the appeals, challenging the refusal to injunct the party from implementing its July 11 general council resolutions abolishing the posts of Coordinator and Joint coordinator, and reviving the post of General Secretary (thereby reverting back to the single leadership days of the party founder and late Chief Ministers MGR and J.Jayalalithaa), would be taken up for final hearing on April 20 and 21.

If the arguments could not be completed within those two days, then they could be continued on April 24 too, the judges said.

Senior Counsel P.S. Raman and C. Manishankar, representing the appellants, feared that the party should not end up issuing new membership cards to the supporters of General Secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami alone, and then end up claiming before the court that the appellants’ supporters, holding the old membership cards, would not be considered members.

Responding to it, AIADMK Counsel said the membership drive would go on for about six months and therefore there was no need for the appellants to have unnecessarily disturbed the court by getting the appeals listed beforehand.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.