September 19, 2026 04:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed
BJP alleged that Kejriwal's comments stem from his fear of losing Delhi polls. (Image credit: Kejriwal facebook page)

Kejriwal questions Gujarat Police in his security cover as EC cites poll duty norms

| @indiablooms | Jan 26, 2025, at 02:38 pm

New Delhi: Days after Punjab Police personnel were removed from Arvind Kejriwal's security detail, the AAP chief claimed that Gujarat Police personnel were now included in his cover, raising questions about the motive behind the move, media reports said.

On Thursday, the Election Commission (EC) and Delhi Police directed the removal of Punjab Police from Kejriwal's security cover, citing that involving personnel from two different states was against the law.

Sources in the Delhi Police emphasised that the arrangement violated established security protocols.

On Saturday, Kejriwal expressed his discontent through X, sharing screenshots of a Gujarat Police order regarding the deployment.

“Read this order of Gujarat Police. The Election Commission has removed Punjab Police from Delhi and deployed Gujarat Police. What is going on?” he wrote.

In response, Gujarat Home Minister Harsh Sanghvi clarified that the deployment followed an EC order and criticised Kejriwal for selectively mentioning Gujarat.

“I’m surprised you’re not aware of the Election Commission’s norms. They’ve requested forces from various states, not just Gujarat. As per their request, eight companies of SRP from Gujarat were sent to Delhi for the scheduled election on January 11. Why the selective mention of Gujarat, Kejriwal ji?” Sanghvi said, reported India Today.

The EC routinely seeks forces from various states during elections to maintain law and order.

Requests are made to the Ministry of Home Affairs, which coordinates the deployment of armed police personnel under the poll panel’s supervision.

For the Delhi elections, 250 police companies were sought, but only 220 were provided, with personnel assigned to tasks like area domination, interstate border checks, and securing polling stations, the report said, citing sources.

BJP leaders criticised Kejriwal’s remarks, alleging they stemmed from fear of losing the Delhi elections.

BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya said Kejriwal should familiarise himself with the standard EC protocols for security arrangements during polls, said the report.

On Friday, Delhi Police sources revealed that the deployment of more than 10-12 armed personnel from Punjab Police for Kejriwal’s security in recent days violated the "Yellow Book," a security protocol.

Sources added that security responsibility must rest with the local police where the individual resides, as any incident would legally implicate Delhi Police, the report added.

The use of external forces for security, they argued, could lead to accountability issues in the event of an incident.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.