April 15, 2026 01:11 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

'ED can't arrest an accused if...': Supreme Court delivers big judgement on Article 19 of PMLA

| @indiablooms | May 16, 2024, at 07:01 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgement curtailing the Enforcement Directorate (ED)'s power to arrest an accused, media reports said.

The top court ruled the ED can't arrest an accused if he appears as summoned by a court.

The probe agency in that matter can't arrest an accused under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

If the ED wants to arrest the accused, it will have to take the court's permission.

"After cognisance is taken of the offence... the ED and its officers are powerless to exercise powers under Section 19 to arrest the person shown as accused in the complaint," the Supreme Court said as quoted by NDTV.

The Section 19 of PMLA Act empowers ED to arrest anyone on the basis of the material in hand and a reason to consider the person as guilty.

The top court had earlier reserved its order on April 30. 

Earlier, this month, the Supreme Court had stated the probe agency can't be selective in taking inculpatory materials and not the entire evidence.

The court had said as quoted by The Times of India, "Can you be selective in choosing the material? By arrest, you are taking away the liberty of a person. So it is your responsibility to reflect upon the entire material. You have to take a balanced view and cannot neglect other material.

"You have to take a balanced view and cannot neglect other material. You cannot exclude one material that does not point towards him. In that case, it would be violative of Section 19 of the Act."

The court had remarked this in response to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's submission that several statements where he was not named were provided but those were ignored by the ED.

Kejriwal, who was arrested in the liquor policy scam, is now on an interim bail till June 1.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.