April 10, 2026 09:24 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto | Nitish Kumar takes Rajya Sabha oath; power shift looms in Bihar | Sting video fallout: AIMIM snaps electoral ties with Humayun Kabir in Bengal | Israel says Hezbollah chief’s nephew-cum-secretary killed in Beirut strikes last night | Modi slams TMC on trade, fisheries at Haldia; vows 7th pay commission for govt employees | ‘US military will remain in and around Iran’: Trump amid fragile ceasefire | BJP eyes Assam hattrick, Puducherry comeback; LDF faces Kerala test | Israel claims Hezbollah chief's nephew killed in Beirut strikes last night | Jaishankar’s high-stakes diplomatic tour: EAM to visit UAE this week, first visit amid Middle East conflict | Passport row: Barricades outside Pawan Khera’s Hyderabad house after Himanta Biswa Sarma's warning
Maharashtra
Photo Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Decide on disqualification pleas against Sena MLAs by Dec 31: SC directs Maharashtra Speaker

| @indiablooms | Oct 31, 2023, at 02:06 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: The Supreme Court Monday directed the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar to decide the disqualification petitions against Shiv Sena and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) MLAs by December 31 with respect to last year's political crisis in the state.

The apex court directed Narwekar to decide the disqualification petitions against Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and the MLAs (Members of the Legislative Assembly) who backed him during the rebellion against Uddhav Thackeray last year.

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, and also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, passed the order.

"The procedural wranglings should not be permitted to delay the petitions. We direct that proceedings shall be concluded and directions passed by December 31, 2023," a bench of the top court, led by the CJI, said.

During the course of the hearing Monday, the court expressed its displeasure over the delay in deciding the disqualification petitions and observed, "We are concerned that the sanctity of the tenth schedule must be maintained. Otherwise, we are throwing these provisions to the wind."

"We will list the proceedings in the first week of January now," the Supreme Court said.

The Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, senior law officer appearing for Maharashtra Speaker, told the court that he could conclude proceedings on cross-disqualification petitions by Shiv Sena factions by February 29.

It was strongly opposed by a senior lawyer, Kapil Sibal who appeared for Uddhav Thackeray group. He pleaded that it had been more than almost 5-6 months that the petitions were pending before him and he needed to take the expeditious decision on it.

"The Assembly Speaker is acting arbitrarily and delaying the proceedings," Sibal argued before the bench.

To this, the apex court said, the State Assembly Speaker must endeavour to complete the hearing by December 31.

It also said that now the time is ripe for this court to hear the disqualification petitions.

The court was hearing a plea filed by Jayant Patil, Sunil Prabhu, and others against the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly for a direction to expeditiously decide the disqualification petitions pending against rebel Shiv Sena legislators.

The plea by Sunil Prabhu was filed soon after Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Ajit Pawar and eight MLAs, including Praful Patel and Chhagan Bhujbal, joined the Eknath Shinde faction.

In his plea, Prabhu stated that a Supreme Court Constitution Bench had, on May 11 this year, directed the Speaker to decide the pending disqualification petitions within a reasonable period. However, no such step has yet been taken, he said.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.