September 19, 2026 03:15 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed
Rahul Gandhi is facing defamation charge for allegedly referring to Veer Savarkar as 'servant of British'. Photo courtesy: Official Facebook

Court imposes Rs. 200 fine on Rahul Gandhi for skipping appearance in Savarakar defamatory remark case

| @indiablooms | Mar 06, 2025, at 01:30 am

Lucknow/IBNS: A Lucknow Court on Wednesday imposed a fine of Rs. 200 on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for repeatedly failing to appear before it in connection with a case related to his remarks on freedom fighter Veer Savarkar.

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) also issued a strict warning, directing Gandhi to appear before the court on April 14, 2025.

The judge said if Gandhi fails to appear again, he could face legal consequences.

The case originated based on a complaint filed by Nripendra Pandey, who objected to a statement made by Rahul Gandhi during a press conference in Maharashtra on December 17, 2022.

Gandhi had then allegedly referred to Veer Savarkar as "a servant of the British" and "a pension receiver."

The complainant argued that these remarks were inflammatory and aimed at inciting enmity in society.

He also claimed that pamphlets containing similar comments were distributed among journalists at the event.

A demand was made to register a case against Gandhi under Sections 153(A) and 505 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly promoting discord through his statements.

During Wednesday's hearing, Gandhi's lawyer, Pranshu Agrawal, filed an application seeking an exemption from his appearance.

He stated that Gandhi, as the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, had a pre-scheduled meeting with a foreign dignitary on the same day and was preoccupied with official responsibilities.

The lawyer assured the court that Gandhi was not deliberately avoiding the hearing and respected the judicial process.

The court, however, did not take Gandhi's absence lightly and imposed a Rs. 200 fine. It ordered his mandatory appearance on April 14, 2025, cautioning that failure to comply could result in the issuance of a non-bailable warrant.

Besides the Savarkar-related case, Rahul Gandhi is also facing another legal challenge stemming from a statement he made during an economic survey in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections.

Pankaj Pathak, president of the All India Hindu Federation Mandal, filed a complaint in June 2024, alleging that Gandhi's comments regarding the distribution of wealth hurt religious sentiments.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.