October 23, 2026 05:37 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tiger Shroff, not Salman Khan, was the main target, probe reveals shocking details | Dammam airport attack: Indian killed, two compatriots injured as Saudi Arabia faces fresh strikes | ‘Among others’: Macron takes swipe at Trump over France unrest, calls foreign leaders’ remarks ‘stupid’ | ‘Specific threat-related inputs’: Delhi Police blocks Diljit Dosanjh’s Delhi concert | ‘Barbaad kare alfaz mere’: Ranbir Kapoor apologises for Dussehra gaffe in Kolkata | Delhi court releases CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka after 7 days in custody | ‘We are seeing what is happening outside our country’: Delhi HC judge’s remark as CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka withdraw custody plea | Salman Khan was the original target? Tiger Shroff firing probe reveals shocking twist | ‘UN experts are an oxymoron’: Marco Rubio takes swipe at UN, refuses to comment on India's protests | ‘US ties with no country come at India's expense’: Marco Rubio addresses concerns over Pakistan, China
Switzerland revokes India's MFN status. Photo courtesy: Representational/Unsplash

Switzerland revokes India's 'Most Favoured Nation' status over 2023 Supreme Court ruling in Nestle case

| @indiablooms | Dec 14, 2024, at 02:02 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Following Supreme Court of India's ruling on the Nestle case in 2023, Switzerland has revoked the country's 'Most Favoured Nation' (MFN) status that was accorded to New Delhi under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) treaty.

Switzerland's move marks an important shift in bilateral relationships, which will leave a big impact on Indian companies operating in Switzerland as well as the Swiss investments in India.

In its official statement on December 11, the Swiss finance department cited the Supreme Court of India's 2023 ruling behind its decision to remove India's MFN status.

In its order, the Supreme Court had said that the MFN clause between two nations does not apply automatically when a country joins the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), especially when the Indian government already had a prior tax treaty with that country before joining the grouping, NDTV reported.

Headquartered in Paris, the OECD was established in 1961 and is known as a forum and knowledge hub for data, analysis, and best practices in public policy to build stronger, fairer, and cleaner societies - helping to shape better policies for better lives.

It works closely with policymakers, stakeholders, and citizens to establish evidence-based international standards and to find solutions to social, economic and environmental challenges.

India had signed tax agreements with Lithuania and Colombia under which the tax rates on certain types of income were lower than the rates it provided to OECD countries. Both countries later joined the OECD.

Under the OECD, the MFN clause is that one country obligates itself to its treaty partner with regard to offering it a 'more favourable' tax treatment.

Switzerland, hence, considered that after Colombia and Lithuania joined the OECD, it would mean that a 5 percent rate for dividends would apply to the India-Switzerland tax treaty under the MFN clause, instead of the 10 percent that was mentioned in it.

However, the Supreme Court observed that the MFN clause between two nations does not apply automatically when a country joins the OECD and that the prior tax treaty takes precedence unless the MFN clause is specifically mentioned in a 'notification' in accordance with Section 90 of the Income Tax Act.

What was the Nestle case?

According to the statement by Switzerland's finance department, in 2021, the Delhi High Court while hearing the case against Nestle, upheld the application of the residual tax rates taking into consideration the MFN clause under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

This was in line with how Switzerland wanted it.

However, in a ruling dated October 19, 2023, the Supreme Court reversed the high court's judgement and said the MFN clause would not apply automatically.

The Indian apex court's ruling impacted Nestle and in turn, went against what Switzerland was expecting.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.