October 23, 2026 04:30 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tiger Shroff, not Salman Khan, was the main target, probe reveals shocking details | Dammam airport attack: Indian killed, two compatriots injured as Saudi Arabia faces fresh strikes | ‘Among others’: Macron takes swipe at Trump over France unrest, calls foreign leaders’ remarks ‘stupid’ | ‘Specific threat-related inputs’: Delhi Police blocks Diljit Dosanjh’s Delhi concert | ‘Barbaad kare alfaz mere’: Ranbir Kapoor apologises for Dussehra gaffe in Kolkata | Delhi court releases CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka after 7 days in custody | ‘We are seeing what is happening outside our country’: Delhi HC judge’s remark as CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka withdraw custody plea | Salman Khan was the original target? Tiger Shroff firing probe reveals shocking twist | ‘UN experts are an oxymoron’: Marco Rubio takes swipe at UN, refuses to comment on India's protests | ‘US ties with no country come at India's expense’: Marco Rubio addresses concerns over Pakistan, China
Gautam Adani X handle

Bombay HC clears Gautam and Rajesh Adani in Rs 388 cr market violation case

| @indiablooms | Mar 18, 2025, at 11:56 pm

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday discharged Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani and Managing Director Rajesh Adani from a case involving alleged market regulation violations amounting to nearly ₹388 crore, The Economic Times reported.

The case, filed in 2012 by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), accused Adani Enterprises Limited (AEL) and its promoters of criminal conspiracy and cheating.

In 2019, Gautam and Rajesh Adani petitioned the Bombay HC to quash a sessions court ruling that had declined to discharge them from the case.

Justice R N Laddha’s bench overturned the sessions court's order on Monday, effectively exonerating the Adanis.

The SFIO had initially charged 12 individuals, including the Adanis, in 2012. A magistrate’s court in Mumbai had discharged them in May 2014, but the SFIO challenged this decision.

In November 2019, a sessions court reinstated the charges, arguing that the SFIO had presented a case of alleged unlawful gains by the Adani Group.

The Adanis later contested this ruling in the High Court, calling it "arbitrary and illegal."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.