August 26, 2026 03:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court directs Tarun Tejpal to surrender within two weeks | Supreme Court notice to 20 rebel TMC MPs in disqualification plea | ‘Reservation for poor, not caste’: Stir at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar | Dalit woman 'gangrape-murder' shocker in Karnataka: 4 arrested after body found in well | India dismisses Pakistan's 'frustration' over US envoy's J&K remark | Centre denies US visit clearance to Telangana CM Revanth Reddy, says programmes 'not appropriate' | Delhi Police register FIR in pellet gun case after Rahul Gandhi's sit-in | Rahul Gandhi stages dharna at Delhi police station over CJP protest crackdown, targets Amit Shah | CJP school tour turns chaotic in Jaipur: Cars vandalised, stones pelted as Ashutosh Ranka alleges BJP ‘goons’ attack | Vande Mataram row: Kangana Ranaut slams Sharmila Tagore, says ‘come out of Hindu-Muslim mindset’
Gautam Adani X handle

Bombay HC clears Gautam and Rajesh Adani in Rs 388 cr market violation case

| @indiablooms | Mar 18, 2025, at 11:56 pm

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday discharged Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani and Managing Director Rajesh Adani from a case involving alleged market regulation violations amounting to nearly ₹388 crore, The Economic Times reported.

The case, filed in 2012 by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), accused Adani Enterprises Limited (AEL) and its promoters of criminal conspiracy and cheating.

In 2019, Gautam and Rajesh Adani petitioned the Bombay HC to quash a sessions court ruling that had declined to discharge them from the case.

Justice R N Laddha’s bench overturned the sessions court's order on Monday, effectively exonerating the Adanis.

The SFIO had initially charged 12 individuals, including the Adanis, in 2012. A magistrate’s court in Mumbai had discharged them in May 2014, but the SFIO challenged this decision.

In November 2019, a sessions court reinstated the charges, arguing that the SFIO had presented a case of alleged unlawful gains by the Adani Group.

The Adanis later contested this ruling in the High Court, calling it "arbitrary and illegal."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.