September 30, 2026 07:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Israel-bound flight lands in Saudi Arabia as pilots fight in cockpit, stabbing triggers hijack scare mid-air | Vimal ad row: SRK, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff respond to FDA notices, says Tukaram Mundhe | Vijay’s TVK expands to Bengal? Party breaks silence on Purba Bardhaman office | ‘This guy is a monster’: Trump’s hilarious praise for Sundar Pichai, Google CEO’s witty reply | Gyanesh Kumar row exposes INDIA bloc rift: DMK, AAP skip meet, Akhilesh sends representative | SIR row: Supreme Court to hear plea against CEC Gyanesh Kumar next week | Sambhal violence case: SC quashes key accused Mulla Afroz's NSA detention, slaps Rs 10 lakh cost on UP govt | Nandigram bypoll twist: Calcutta HC grants interim bail to Congress candidate Milan Pradhan till Oct 21 | Myanmar military airstrike horror: 49 killed, 58 injured as bombs hit crowded Rakhine market | Britain reopens refugee routes for Afghans, Palestinians as immigration and integration battle intensifies
Sridhar Vembu
Zoho CEO believes 2-5% of the population driving themselves hard could be enough for broad-based economic development. Photo courtesy: X/Sridhar Vembu

It is necessary for economic development: Zoho CEO reignites 70-hour work week debate

| @indiablooms | Dec 27, 2024, at 02:05 pm

Chennai/IBNS: Zoho Corporation CEO Sridhar Vembu has reignited the debate over the 70-hour work week, initially raised by Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy.

In a lengthy post on X (formerly Twitter), Vembu argued that the rationale behind such a demanding work schedule is the belief that it is essential for economic development.

He pointed to the experiences of East Asian countries like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and China, which have grown through extreme work cultures, often imposing heavy work burdens on their populations.

However, Vembu noted a downside, observing that these countries now face low birth rates, with governments struggling to encourage higher birth rates.

He then posed two key questions: "Is such hard work necessary for economic development? Is this development worth the cost of a lonely old age for many people?"

In addressing the first question, Vembu argued that it’s not necessary for everyone to work excessively.

He explained, "It’s sufficient if only a small percentage of the population works intensely. I am part of that group, but I don't prescribe this for others."

Vembu believes that 2-5 percent of the population driving themselves hard could be enough for broad-based economic development, while others should be able to maintain a healthy work-life balance.

Regarding the second question, Vembu concluded that the price of extreme work is not worth it.

He expressed that he doesn’t want India to replicate China's economic model if it means sacrificing the country’s demographic health.

With India already at replacement-level fertility, particularly in its southern states, he warned that further declines in birth rates to East Asian levels would be detrimental.

Vembu ended his post by emphasising his belief that economic progress doesn’t need to come at the cost of "demographic suicide."

The debate over the 70-hour work week began when Narayana Murthy called for increased productivity in India's workforce.

In an interview with Infosys's former CFO Mohandas Pai, Murthy had argued that India’s low work productivity was a barrier to competing with countries like Japan and China.

He urged India’s youth to embrace the idea of working 70 hours a week to boost national productivity and economic competitiveness.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.