February 24, 2026 05:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘No systemic risk’: Sanjay Malhotra breaks silence on ₹590 crore IDFC First Bank Limited fraud | India urges all nationals to leave Iran 'by available means' as US-Iran tension grows | India shines at BAFTA! All you need to know about Manipuri film Boong that stunned global cinema | Mamata Banerjee’s former right-hand man and ex-Railway Minister Mukul Roy dies after prolonged illness | Rahul Gandhi slams Modi as ‘compromised’, says PM can’t renegotiate India-US trade deal | Terror alert in Delhi: LeT may target Chandni Chowk with IED, say reports | US Supreme Court shocks Donald Trump on tariffs — but India may still end up paying more | PM Modi warns ‘AI must not control humans’ as India unveils bold tech vision at AI Impact Summit 2026 | Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol sentenced to life over failed martial law bid | Tata Group joins hands with OpenAI in massive AI push to transform India and global industries
Mahua Moitra. Photo: Official Facebook.

'Why don't you sit together and sort it out?' Delhi HC tells Mahua Moitra, advocate Jai Dehadrai over dog custody

| @indiablooms | Sep 03, 2025, at 10:59 pm

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked why Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai are unable to "sit together" and resolve their battle over the custody of a pet dog, which erupted following allegations of parliamentary impropriety and corruption against the politician.

 

"Why don't you sit together and sort it out? What relief is she seeking in the suit?" Justice Jain asked, referring to Moitra's petition seeking shared custody of the dog, a Rottweiler named Henry.

The Trinamool MP and Dehadrai, a Supreme Court lawyer, were reportedly in a relationship and have not been on good terms ever since they parted ways.

The two have now accused each other of "stealing" Henry and have been engaged in a legal battle since 2023.

Moitra said Henry belongs to her and has sought joint custody of the dog.

Meanwhile, Dehadrai has challenged a trial court order that restrains him from publicising the custody battle with Moitra.

Appearing on behalf of Dehadrai, advocate Sanjay Ghose said he was upset with the trial court's order restricting both from publicly speaking about the case. He said the order, which was passed on a suit by Moitra, violated his freedom of speech.

He also said he had earlier made a post on X without mentioning the details of the case, but it was later termed a violation of the court order.

"A frivolous case is filed against me, and I can't talk about it, I can't discuss it, I can't write about it? Where is it necessary for the fairness of the trial? She is an MP. Can an MP claim a higher right over a normal plaintiff?" Ghose said.

The High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Trinamool MP on the matter and posted the same for hearing in December.

Dehadrai has repeatedly claimed that Henry was with him ever since he was 40 days old. He also said he brought the dog, making him his real guardian.

A complaint by Dehadrai in 2023, whom Moitra had referred to as a "jilted ex", led the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee to recommend the latter's expulsion from Parliament for allegedly accepting "illegal gratifications" from a businessman to raise questions in Parliament at his behest.

Moitra had denied the charge of receiving any pecuniary benefit. She termed the Lok Sabha panel recommendation a "pre-fixed match by a kangaroo court".

In September 2023, Moitra reportedly filed a police case against Dehadrai and sent senior officers to his house to get him to sign a custody agreement for Henry, which he refused.

In a complaint with Delhi Police in November that year, Dehadrai alleged that the Trinamool MP was using his pet as an "excuse to come personally" to his residence in an attempt to intimidate him.

He also accused her of "trespassing", "criminal intimidation" and "breach of peace" at his residence.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.