August 19, 2025 07:53 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Extremely unfortunate': Rajnath Singh slams Oppn over ruckus in Parliament during discussion on Shubhanshu Shukla | INDIA bloc mulls bringing motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar amid faceoff over 'voter fraud' | Bengal jobs scam: Former minister Partha Chatterjee granted bail in CBI case by Supreme Court | Multiple schools in Delhi evacuated after receiving bomb threat message | Heavy rain batters Mumbai, schools and colleges shut, train and flight services affected | The Bengal Files trailer launch event disrupted in Kolkata, Vivek Agnihotri claims 'hotel wires were snapped' | Donald Trump claims Russia lost 'oil client' India after tariff imposition | 'Can't allow infiltrators to take over India': PM Modi announces 'high-power demography mission' from Red Fort on I-Day | 'A proud and golden chapter': PM Modi lauds RSS in his Independence Day speech | 'I will stand like a wall...': PM Modi's big message amid tariff war with Trump
UP cop mistakenly names judge as accused in theft case. Photo courtesy: Representational/Pixabay

UP cop mistakenly names judge as 'accused' in arrest warrant of a theft case, gets suspended

| @indiablooms | Apr 15, 2025, at 12:53 am

Firozabad/IBNS: A police officer in Uttar Pradesh's Firozabad was suspended after he mistakenly named a judge in the arrest warrant for theft.

According to reports, the judge ordered the cop to issue a non-bailable warrant against a man who was accused of theft.

Instead of listing the accused, the police officer 'mistakenly' named the judge in the warrant.

The cop has been suspended, and the judge, surprised to see his name in the warrant, has ordered an inquiry against the cop for the "grave" error.

Sub-inspector Banwari Lal, who was posted at Thana Uttar, named Judge Nagma Khan in the warrant instead of Rajkumar, the accused against whom the judge had initially ordered a non-bailable warrant.

The cop in his report said the "accused" was not found at the location during the execution of the warrant.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Saurabh took action after the error surfaced.

The district police chief said he ordered the sub-inspector to be sent to police lines and directed an inquiry into the incident to determine the reason behind the "grave" error.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu