December 08, 2025 04:29 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre imposes temporary fare caps as ticket prices defy gravity amid IndiGo meltdown | 'Action is coming': Aviation Minister blames IndiGo for countrywide air travel chaos | In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata | Sam Altman is betting big on India! OpenAI in advanced talks with Tata to build AI infrastructure | Government removes mandatory pre-installation of Sanchar Saathi App. Know all details | Calcutta HC overturns controversial Bengal job annulment — 32,000 teachers rejoice!

Tobacco: Panel recommends massive reduction in size of pictorial warning

| | Mar 15, 2016, at 08:19 pm
New Delhi, Mar 15 (IBNS) In a major setback for the anti-tobacco movement, a parliamentary panel has recommended major dilution of the pictorial warning size.

Reports said while the Ministry of Health has promised to implement anti-tobacco warnings covering 85 per cent area of both sides of cigarette and beedi packs, the Committee on Subordinate Legislation has mooted only 50 per cent coverage in its report tabled in Lok Sabha on Tuesday

For beedis, the panel wants only single sided warnings as against full of coverage the Ministry is planning.

The committee, headed by beedi baron Dalip Gandhi — a BJP member — had forced the Ministry last year to hold its notification on tobacco warnings that was to come into force from April 1, 2015.

The justification given was the panel is examining the validity of warnings in aiding reduction of tobacco use.

The Ministry swore under oath in Rajasthan High Court that it would issue its pending notification this April. 

With the final report tabled on Tuesday also backing the beedi lobby rather than public health, and Ministry may again be forced to delay its notification.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.