April 19, 2026 11:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pushback from smartphone makers: Centre drops Aadhaar app pre-install plan — report | Meta eyes first wave of layoffs on May 20: Report | TCS breaks silence on Nida Khan: ‘No HR role, no power’ in Nashik case | ‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls
Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court grants interim bail to 13 prisoners who were in regular jail despite proving juvenility

| @indiablooms | Jul 08, 2021, at 10:36 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Thursday granted interim bail to thirteen prisoners who started their 14 to 22 year stretches in the Agra jail despite proving their juvenility at the time of offence.

A bench comprising Justices Indira Banerjee and V Ramasubramanian said, "It is not in dispute that 13 petitioners have been held by Juvenile Justice Board as juveniles. Let interim bail be granted to them by presenting personal bonds."

Additional Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh, Garima Prashad informed the bench that Allahabad High Court had passed orders to identify the ones who had passed the age of juvenility.

Prashad said facts needed to be verified even as she said interim bail might be granted to them.

On July 1, the apex court had issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government in the matter.

The petition contended the “very unfortunate and sorry state of affairs” in Uttar Pradesh, where many prisoners continue to languish in jail despite proving their claim of juvenility.

It also said that these persons had spent years in “hardcore jails” among “hardcore criminals” and this negates the purpose and objects of the Juvenile Justice Act.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.