April 25, 2026 03:22 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal polls: Mob attacks central forces, 3 CAPF personnel injured in Birbhum | ‘People voting to protect their rights’: Mamata says high turnout backs TMC in Bengal | ‘Fear is being defeated’: PM Modi says high voter turnout signals BJP win in Bengal | Crude bomb attack in Murshidabad’s Nowda as violence hits Bengal polling | ‘Mamata Banerjee’s politics fuelled BJP growth in Bengal’: Rahul Gandhi | 'Will never forget’: Nation remembers Pahalgam victims as leaders vow strong fight against terror | 'India will never bow to any form of terror': PM Modi on Pahalgam terror attack anniversary | TCS Nashik case: No interim bail for Danish Shaikh in religious sentiments case | US woman alleges sexual assault at Karnataka homestay; owner among 2 arrested | ‘PM Modi is a terrorist’: Mallikarjun Kharge sparks row; BJP hits back

SP chief Akhilesh Yadav accuses Speaker's rights being curtailed; Amit Shah slams him

| @indiablooms | Aug 08, 2024, at 10:55 pm

New Delhi: Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Thursday accused the government of narrowing the scope of the rights of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and asserted that the Opposition would have to protect his rights, eliciting a sharp retort from Home Minister Amit Shah.

"Your rights and our rights are being curtailed. I had told you that you are the judge of democracy. I have heard that some of your rights are being snatched and we would have to fight for you," the Kannauj MP said during the debate on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Lok Sabha, reported NDTV.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah opposed Yadav's allegations, stating that the Speaker belonged to the whole house and not just the opposition.

"This is an insult to the Chair. The rights of the Speaker do not belong to the Opposition, but to the whole House. Don't speak in a roundabout way. You are not the protector of the Speaker's rights," Shah said, according to the report.

Later, Birla told Akhilesh Yadav that he and other members of the House must not remark on the Chair. "This is my expectation, no personal remarks should be made on the Chair," he said.

Yadav lashed out at the legislation, alleging that it was a well thought out political move. "When there is a democratic process for election, why nominate people? No person from outside the community is part of other religious bodies. What is the point of including non-Muslims in Waqf bodies?" he said.

He claimed that the BJP had brought this law to appease some hardline supporters after losing a substantial number of seats in the Lok Sabha election.

Opposition parties have united to challenge a new piece of legislation designed to tackle issues concerning the authority of State Waqf Boards, the registration and survey of Waqf properties, and the removal of encroachments.

The proposed legislation seeks to amend 44 sections of the 1995 Waqf Act. It suggests that both the Central Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards include two women members.

It also mandates that funds received by the Waqf Board be allocated for the welfare of widows, divorcees, and orphans as directed by the government.

Another significant proposal is the protection of women's inheritance rights. The bill also introduces the controversial idea of including non-Muslim members in Waqf bodies.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.