June 06, 2026 06:20 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After Annamalai exit, BJP gives up Andhra Rajya Sabha seat in NDA rejig | K. Annamalai quits BJP, triggers speculations over his new party | RBI hits pause button again! Repo rate remains unchanged at 5.25% amid global turmoil | 'Was it directed by ruling ecosystem?': Congress questions LIC stake in Rajesh Exports under SEBI scanner | Boost for Congress! Vijay allots Tamil Nadu's lone Rajya Sabha seat to key ally | Fresh trouble for Mamata: Complaint filed over explosive Amit Shah claim in Osman Hadi case | 'Communication gap': Rajesh Exports rejects SEBI allegations, says revenues were not overstated | ₹15.2 lakh crore revenue questioned! SEBI action sends Rajesh Exports shares tumbling | 'If not now, when!': Sonam Wangchuk backs Cockroach Janta Party protest; spokespersons named ahead of founder Abhijeet Dipke's India return | Cabinet approves Rs. 10,000 crore support package to stabilise ATF prices for airlines
Sena vs Sena

Sena's Uddhav Thackeray faction moves SC objecting to a meeting between Assembly Speaker and Eknath Shinde

| @indiablooms | Jan 10, 2024, at 02:11 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: Shiv Sena's Uddhav Thackeray faction on Tuesday moved the Supreme Court, objecting to a meeting between Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde ahead of the verdict in the Shiv Sena MLA disqualification case.

The application filed in the form of a writ petition by the Uddhav Thackeray faction has raised objections to Speaker Rahul Narwekar meeting Chief Minister Shinde at his residence on Jan 7 whereas the verdict by him is scheduled to be announced on Jan 10 at 4 pm.

The Shiv Sena Leader has sought expeditious disposal of disqualification petitions against the Shinde faction and to place additional documents on record.

"It is highly improper for the Speaker to meet Eknath Shinde three days before deciding on the disqualification petition. The Speaker is required to act impartially. However, the present act of the Speaker raises questions about his fairness and impartiality in the decision-making process," the application stated.

The petition further said that the present act of the Speaker violates the legal maximin that justice should not only be done, it should also be seen.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.