December 25, 2025 10:50 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tarique Rahman returns to Bangladesh after 17 years | Shocking killing inside AMU campus: teacher shot dead during evening walk | Horror on Karnataka highway: sleeper bus bursts into flames after truck crash, 9 killed | PM Modi attends Christmas service at Delhi church, sends message of love and compassion | Delhi erupts over lynching of Hindu man in Bangladesh; protest outside High Commission | Targeted killing sparks global outrage: American lawmakers condemn mob lynching of Hindu man in Bangladesh | Assam on a ‘powder keg’: Himanta Biswa Sarma flags demographic shift, Chicken’s Neck fears | Bangladesh on edge: Student leader shot as pre-poll violence deepens after Hadi killing | Historic deal sealed: India, New Zealand sign landmark Free Trade Agreement in record time | Supreme court snubs urgent plea to stop PMO’s chadar offering at Ajmer Sharif

SC to consider urgent hearing of PIL against J&K special status

| @indiablooms | Feb 18, 2019, at 10:37 pm

New Delhi, Feb 18 (IBNS): Supreme Court will consider the plea seeking urgent hearing of a PIL challenging the constitutional validity of Article 370 that gives special status to Jammu and Kashmir and limits Parliament's power to make laws for the state.

BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay submitted the plea to which the court said: "Give the mentioning memo to the registrar. We will see it."

According to The Times of India, Upadhyay contends that the special status accorded to Jammu and Kashmir at the time of the framing of the Constitution was temporary and that it lapsed with the dissolution of the state's constituent assembly on January 26, 1957.

The plea also contends that the separate constitution for Jammu and Kashmir goes against "supremacy of the Constitution of India and contrary to the dictum of 'One Nation, One Constitution, One National Anthem, One National Flag'".

The Jammu and Kashmir constitution is invalid because it does not have the approval of the President of India, which is mandatory according to the Constitution of India, the plea argues.

The plea is likely to come up for hearing next week, the report added.

 


 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.