July 21, 2026 09:57 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Abhijeet Dipke has been picked up': CJP alleges police detained founder as Parliament march sparks chaos | Major twist in CJP protest: Abhijeet Dipke ends hunger strike | PM Modi calls for 'logic, not chaos' as stormy monsoon session opens amid CJP protest | Spain beat Argentina 1-0 in extra time to win FIFA World Cup 2026 | NEET protest escalates! CJP demands PM Modi's resignation after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Chaos at Jantar Mantar! Woman throws ink at CJP chief Abhijeet Dipke; he replies 'Blue is my colour' | A historic new frontier': PM Modi hails India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 launch | Mission Aagaman takes off: India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 makes history | NEET protest explodes: CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke begins indefinite hunger strike after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Jantar Mantar Protest: Cops remove Sonam Wangchuk from protest site, admitted to hospital

SC concludes hearing on triple talaq, reserves verdict

| | May 18, 2017, at 08:29 pm
New Delhi, May 18 (IBNS) : The Supreme Court on Thursday finished hearing the triple talaq case and reserved its verdict on whether the practice is constitutionally valid, reports said.

The issue was heard for six days by a five-member all-faith bench of the top court following a clutch of petitions challenging triple talaq, polygamy and 'nikah halala'.

The judges were drawn from different religious communities- Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian, and Parsi.

On the last day of the hearing, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), which is defending the practice of  triple talaq  said it is ready to issue an advisory to all qazis (Islamic jurists) to ascertain women's view on triple talaq and put it in the nikahnaama (contract of the Islamic marriage).

Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal appeared for AIMPLB. He argued that triple talaq is a matter of belief and hence the question of its constitutional validity does not arise.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.