July 28, 2026 09:11 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy | 'Can't lathicharge people just because they are protesting': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over NEET protest crackdown | 'Victory of democracy': Sonam Wangchuk congratulates Gen Z as Dharmendra Pradhan resigns after month-long NEET protests | 'Democracy has triumphed': CJP celebrates as Dharmendra Pradhan quits, warns Centre 'Don't mess with cockroaches' | Centre buckles under CJP-led NEET protests; Dharmendra Pradhan quits as Education Minister | Delhi Police flags 2,500 suspected criminals at Jantar Mantar amid NEET protest | 'No assurances, sack Dharmendra Pradhan': CJP fires back at PM Modi over NEET row | 'Don't insult students': Rahul Gandhi tears into PM Modi's midnight NEET video, demands Dharmendra Pradhan's exit | Trump slaps fresh tariffs on India, China and 58 others over forced labour concerns

Salman hit and run case: Prosecutor demands re-examination RTO officer

| | Jan 09, 2015, at 12:11 am
New Delhi, Jan 8 (IBNS): In a development to Bollywood actor Salman Khan's hit and run case, the prosecutor has asked for a re-examination of the RTO officer, reports said.
The prosecutor argued that certain replies of the RTO during cross examination were not clear.
 
The Supreme Court stated that the clarification of such can be done during re-examination.
 
Meanwhile, the defence reportedly argued that the witness is not qualified as he was given one-day long training session on Indica and not imported cars.
 
Earlier, Khan was found to have high alcohol content in his blood after he was made to undergo a test following the accident.
 
This was brought to light by a chemical analysis expert who had testified in a Mumbai Sessions Court. 
 
The expert reportedly claimed that the alcohol content was found to be higher than normal in Khan's blood sample.
 
The alcohol content in Khan's blood was 62mg, which is more than double the permissible limit of 30mg, reports said.
 
On Dec 5, 2013, the sessions court in Mumbai ordered fresh trial in the case.
 
Hearing Khan's plea in the case, the court had ordered all evidences and witnesses be re-examined.
 
The court on July 24, 2013 framed new charges against Khan in case.
 
According to reports, Khan was to be tried for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
 
Khan had pleaded not guilty to the charges. However, if proven guilty, the actor might had to spend 10 years in prison.
 
Khan was earlier facing the trial for rash and negligent driving, which awards the convict with a maximum sentence of two years.
 
However, the court handling his case, in January 2013, accepted that the police provided evidence that merits trying the actor for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, which awards the convict a punishment upto ten years in prison.
 
The case was then transferred to the sessions court as the magistrates' court did not have the jurisdiction to hear the same.
 
In February 2013, Khan challenged the order and filed a revision petition, pleading that the stringent charges against him be dropped.
 
In 2002, the actor driving a SUV had run into a bakery in suburban Bandra, and the accident took the life of one pavement dweller while injuring four persons sleeping on the pavement outside.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.