September 05, 2026 08:42 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj, accused of assaulting CJP protester's father, detained in UP | Yasin Malik’s double shock from jail: Announces divorce, refuses to defend himself in Sarla Bhat case | Sonia Gandhi’s memoir finds new publisher as HarperCollins steps in amid Penguin row | 1,000 RSS-backed schools in Bengal? Suvendu Adhikari sets one-year target | PM Modi hails Giorgia Meloni on becoming longest-serving postwar Italian PM | HarperCollins to publish Sonia Gandhi’s memoir amid Penguin row | Supreme Court slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR row: ‘No power to take action against law students’ | ‘Technical error, not U-turn’: Kerala CM Satheesan denies deleting video slamming cleric’s women remarks after Islamic Scholars’ meet | Bombay HC orders CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput's ex-manager Disha Salian's death case | Vijay for PM in 2029? TVK says Rahul Gandhi will ‘hold his hand’ to make him Prime Minister
In image Supreme Court of India. Photo courtesy: Wikimedia commons

Pahalgam attack: Supreme Court stays deportation of PoK-born man, his family with Indian passports

| @indiablooms | May 03, 2025, at 12:26 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court has granted interim relief to a family of Pakistani nationals facing deportation despite holding Indian passports, Aadhaar cards, and voter IDs, media reports said.

The top court stayed the move to deport the Accenture employee from Bengaluru and his family following the Pahalgam terror attack.

It directed the petitioners to present their case before the appropriate authorities.

Petitioner Ahmed Tariq Butt, a Bengaluru-based man born in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), said that his family was being forcibly taken to the Attari Wagah border despite being Indian citizens.

He told the court they were detained at the border, even though they possessed valid Indian documents, including passports issued by the Ministry of External Affairs.

The apex court directed authorities to verify the family's documents and ordered that no coercive action should be taken against Butt, who has an MBA from the IIM in Kerala's Kozhikode, till then.

Butt was also asked to approach the high court for further relief. The Centre, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, contested the move, but the Supreme Court acknowledged "some human element" in this matter.

The Supreme Court, however, clarified that its orders in this case could not be used as precedent in others, a significant statement given the number of reports about Indian nationals, many with Muslim names, being asked to leave the country after visas were cancelled.

The Attari-Wagah border crossing between India and Pakistan shut completely on Thursday amid a face-off between the two nations over the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which left 26 civilians dead.

The crossing was closed from both sides after India said it was planned and executed by the deep state in Pakistan.

Both governments closed border crossings and revoked visas in the first round of diplomatic restrictions following the deadly attack.

Over the past days, Indian authorities have rounded up hundreds of Pakistani nationals in the country on tourist, medical, or other visas, to eject them.

On Wednesday, 24 hours before the border was sealed, 125 Pakistani nationals crossed over, taking the total since Thursday last to over 1,000, including diplomats and support staff.

However, on Thursday afternoon, shortly after the Attari-Wagah border was sealed, a small number of Pakistani nationals, who were sent to the crossing by Indian immigration, could not return home.

It seemed that Pakistani authorities refused to open the gate for their citizens.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.