February 25, 2026 05:07 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court's big move over Bengal SIR! Odisha, Jharkhand judicial officers allowed to complete revision process | ‘Kerala lives in harmony, film’s portrayal wrong’: Kerala High Court raps Kerala Story sequel makers | AI panic hits IT giants: Infosys, TCS, Wipro lead massive market rout as stocks sink to alarming lows | ‘No systemic risk’: Sanjay Malhotra breaks silence on ₹590 crore IDFC First Bank Limited fraud | India urges all nationals to leave Iran 'by available means' as US-Iran tension grows | India shines at BAFTA! All you need to know about Manipuri film Boong that stunned global cinema | Mamata Banerjee’s former right-hand man and ex-Railway Minister Mukul Roy dies after prolonged illness | Rahul Gandhi slams Modi as ‘compromised’, says PM can’t renegotiate India-US trade deal | Terror alert in Delhi: LeT may target Chandni Chowk with IED, say reports | US Supreme Court shocks Donald Trump on tariffs — but India may still end up paying more
Kerala Story 2
Shooter Tara Shahdeo opens up about her own life experience. Photo: Screen-grab/X video

New Delhi/IBNS: Amid the controversy surrounding The Kerala Story: Goes Beyond, national-level shooter Tara Shahdeo has shared her personal experience, saying it resonates with the theme explored in the film.

Speaking about her marriage in 2014 and subsequent religious conversion, Shahdeo opened up about her decade-long legal battle, stating that the subject of the film reflects her own life experience.

Shahdeo told ANI, “My case happened in 2014. That was the first time I heard the term ‘love jihad’ from the media. Until then, I didn’t even know what that word meant. Even today, there are many girls who have not been able to come forward.

“This is such an issue where people think the girl got misled and did it of her own free will. Back then, I felt no one would understand this story, but today it is coming out in society. We have been going to court for 10–12 years. If there had been a discussion about this earlier, we would not have become its victims.”

Meanwhile, the Kerala High Court on Tuesday criticised the makers of the film, observing that it appeared to portray the people of the state in a misleading manner, according to media reports.

The court sought the Centre’s response on whether a screening of the film could be arranged before it delivers its verdict on petitions challenging the censor certification. The petitions allege that the movie depicts the state negatively.

While examining transcripts of certain dialogues, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas orally remarked that the portrayal in the film did not reflect the reality of the state.

“Kerala lives in total harmony. But you have portrayed that this is happening all over Kerala. There is a wrong indication and it can also incite passion. That is where the censor board comes into play. Have you considered that?” the judge was quoted as saying.

Acknowledging concerns over artistic freedom, the court noted that the film’s claim of being inspired by true events and explicitly naming Kerala could potentially create communal tension. The judge directed the makers to arrange a screening of the film for judicial review.

The controversy intensified after the trailer of the sequel portrayed Hindu women allegedly being targeted by Muslim men under the guise of relationships, depicting themes of coercion and radicalisation.

The film is written by Amarnath Jha and Vipul Amrutlal Shah and directed by Kamakhya Narayan Singh.

Earlier, Pinarayi Vijayan had criticised reports about the sequel, alleging it could fuel communal discord in the state.

The first part, The Kerala Story, directed by Sudipto Sen, had sparked widespread controversy after its teaser claimed that 32,000 women from Kerala were converted to Islam and recruited by ISIS.

The figure was widely disputed by political leaders, activists, and fact-checkers, triggering protests, legal challenges, and a nationwide debate over factual accuracy and artistic freedom. The filmmakers later revised their claim, stating the film was inspired by a limited number of real-life cases.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.