April 01, 2026 05:16 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead
Murshidabad Riots
Supreme Court of India hears petition on Murshidabad violence. Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Murshidabad violence: Supreme Court slams petitioner over irresponsible averments in plea

| @indiablooms | Apr 21, 2025, at 02:21 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Monday rebuked a petitioner, who sought a court-monitored probe into the violent anti-Waqf Act protests in West Bengal's Murshidabad, over irresponsible averments in the plea, media reports said.

A top court bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh told advocate Shashank Shekhar Jha, the petitioner, to be responsible in writing averments in a petition.

Justice Kant told Jha as quoted by Live Law, "We should always maintain the integrity and decorum of the institution...Think about what averments are to be made, and what are required to be struck off. Don't seek publicity. Think with a cool mind."

"We respect every citizen who wants to come to us, they are welcome. But with a sense of responsibility. Be careful about what averments are made," he added.

When advocate Jha referred to "media reports" on being asked about the source of information about migration of people to other states due to the violence, Justice Kant was infuriated.

"So you have filed the petition based on media reports! Where is the verification done by you?," fumed Justice Kant.

The court has allowed advocate Jha to file a fresh petition with "better and appropriate particulars" dismissing the previous plea as withdrawn with liberty.

Anti-Waqf violence in Murshidabad

The tension gripped the Muslim-dominated Murshidabad district after three people were killed, railway tracks were blocked, and there was arson and vandalism by the violent protests against the Waqf (Amendment) Act held primarily in Jangipur, Samserganj, Dhuliyan and Suti.

Over 200 people have been arrested in connection with that violence so far.

Attacked by marauding mobs, Hindus from villages fled in boats and via roads to the adjacent district of Malda as Islamic violence claimed three lives and destroyed properties.

The situation was brought under control and the tension was reigned after central forces were deployed as per the directive of the Calcutta High Court in response to Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari's plea.

Videos from ferry ghats showed hordes of Hindu families, including women, children and elderly, fleeing to the safety of the Malda district.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.