March 12, 2026 11:15 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
America’s flip-flop on Russian oil: How Washington sends conflicting signals to India | Big diplomatic win! Iran allows Indian oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz | ‘It was over in the first hour’: Trump declares victory in Iran war, says ‘nothing left to target’ | Indian-origin shopkeepers face targeted attacks in Wembley; Somali men suspected | Iran pulls out of 2026 FIFA World Cup amid war with US-Israel | Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals
SIR
Mamata Banerjee with other advocates in the Supreme Court. Photo: AITC/X

New Delhi/IBNS: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday took her political battle with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to the Supreme Court, launching a sharp attack on the poll body over the controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

In an unusual moment in the top court, Banerjee bypassed her counsel and addressed the bench directly for nearly 10–15 minutes, raising concerns over what she described as discrimination against poll-bound West Bengal.

The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, assured her that the court would attempt to resolve the differences and work towards a solution.

“Sir, the problem is… in the end, we are not getting justice anywhere. I have written six times to the ECI but still not getting any reply. Justice is crying behind closed doors,” the Chief Minister said, folding her hands before the bench.

As her submission progressed, Banerjee escalated her criticism of the Election Commission, alleging that the poll body was following a separate and unfair set of rules for West Bengal, one of the 12 states where the voter revision exercise is currently underway.

Repeating allegations she has made outside the courtroom, Banerjee claimed that voters’ names were deleted due to changes in surnames — a common occurrence among married women.

She also alleged that micro-observers appointed for the exercise were drawn from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled states.

Responding to the allegations, the ECI submitted that non-cooperation by the West Bengal government had compelled it to appoint micro-observers from other states.

Banerjee further drew the court’s attention to six letters she claimed to have written to the Election Commission, alleging that none of them received a response.

Taking note of her submissions, the CJI Surya Kant-led bench issued notice to the Election Commission on Banerjee’s plea. The matter is scheduled to be heard next on Monday.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.