June 06, 2026 03:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After Annamalai exit, BJP gives up Andhra Rajya Sabha seat in NDA rejig | K. Annamalai quits BJP, triggers speculations over his new party | RBI hits pause button again! Repo rate remains unchanged at 5.25% amid global turmoil | 'Was it directed by ruling ecosystem?': Congress questions LIC stake in Rajesh Exports under SEBI scanner | Boost for Congress! Vijay allots Tamil Nadu's lone Rajya Sabha seat to key ally | Fresh trouble for Mamata: Complaint filed over explosive Amit Shah claim in Osman Hadi case | 'Communication gap': Rajesh Exports rejects SEBI allegations, says revenues were not overstated | ₹15.2 lakh crore revenue questioned! SEBI action sends Rajesh Exports shares tumbling | 'If not now, when!': Sonam Wangchuk backs Cockroach Janta Party protest; spokespersons named ahead of founder Abhijeet Dipke's India return | Cabinet approves Rs. 10,000 crore support package to stabilise ATF prices for airlines
Jaishankar asserted that Pakistan’s top military leadership's ideological position may be influencing terrorist incidents like Pahalgam attack. (Image credit: Screen grab)

Jaishankar links Pahalgam terror attack to Pak army chief’s ‘extreme religious outlook’

| @indiablooms | May 22, 2025, at 09:12 pm

New Delhi: External affairs minister S Jaishankar has drawn a direct link between the recent terror attack in Pahalgam — in which mostly Hindu tourists were killed after being identified by their religion — and the “extreme religious outlook” of Pakistan’s army chief, General Asim Munir.

Speaking to Dutch broadcaster NOS, Jaishankar said the assailants deliberately introduced a religious angle to the killings, with the intent of targeting tourism — the backbone of Kashmir’s economy — and fuelling communal discord.

“Tourists were murdered in front of their families after ascertaining their faith, and it was done in a way in which it was intended to harm tourism, which is the mainstay of the Kashmir economy, and to create a religious discord. Deliberately, an element of religion was introduced,” he said.

He further asserted that the ideological position of Pakistan’s top military leadership may be influencing such terrorist incidents.

“And to understand that, you’ve got to also see the Pakistani side — you have a Pakistani leadership, especially their army chief, who is driven by an extreme religious outlook, so there is clearly some connect between the views that were expressed and the behaviour that was done,” Jaishankar said.

The minister also stated that Indian security agencies have identified the perpetrators, and that The Resistance Front (TRF) — a Lashkar-e-Taiba offshoot — had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack.

“We were able to identify who they (terrorists) were because there were pictures of them. There is a body which is called The Resistance Front, which took responsibility for that attack. The body has been on our radar for a number of years. In 2023, 2024, and 2025, we brought this body to the attention of the UN Security Council's 1267 Sanctions Committee,” he said.

TRF has long been flagged by Indian authorities for its activities and links to cross-border terror.

It has also been repeatedly cited at international forums, including the United Nations.

The minister's remarks come days after General Munir, recently elevated to the rank of field marshal, reignited debate by invoking the two-nation theory — the ideological basis for Pakistan’s creation.

Munir urged Pakistani citizens to raise their children with the understanding that they are “different from Hindus” and described Kashmir as Pakistan’s “jugular vein.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.