December 18, 2025 04:12 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Indian Visa Application Centre in Dhaka shuts down early amid rising security concerns | Market update: Sensex tumbles 120 points, Nifty below 25,850 at closing bell | ‘Won’t apologise’: Prithviraj Chavan stands firm on controversial Operation Sindoor remark despite backlash | India summons Bangladesh High Commissioner after provocative 'seven sisters' remark | Amazon eyes $10 billion investment in OpenAI — a gamechanger for AI industry! | Goa nightclub fire horror: Luthra brothers brought back to India from Thailand, arrested | Messi chaos costs minister his job: Aroop Biswas resigns after Salt Lake Stadium fiasco | Bengal SIR draft list out: Around 58 lakh voters’ names dropped | Relief for Sonia, Rahul Gandhi as Delhi court refuses to act on ED chargesheet in National Herald case | Centre moves to replace MGNREGA with 'G Ram G', sets stage for winter session showdown

Governor administration can never be substitute for elected government: Saifuddin Soz

| @indiablooms | Mar 02, 2019, at 03:57 pm

Srinagar, Mar 2 (UNI) Alleging that Governor Administration has been providing negative inputs which have further angered the people in Jammu and Kashmir, senior Congress leader Saifuddin Soz on Saturday said governor rule can under no circumstances can be substitute for an elected government.

“The latest decision by the Governor to implement Central Government decision on 77th Constitutional Amendment, to the State, constitutes a ‘tress-pass, the former union minister said.

This measure needs popular support and should have been left to an elected Government., even though; it offers benefits to a section of society in the state.

“Governor has to realise that the Governor rule can, under no circumstances, be considered to be a substitute for an elected Government. So, it would be in Governor’s own short-run administrative interests to avoid decisions that carry constitutional implications”, he said

He said the other area where the Governor’s Administration is at fault is that it doesn’t often measure the implications of implementing Central Governments decisions in a rush.

'For instance, the blanket ban on Jammu and Kashmir Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI)for five years is uncalled for. The reasons given by the Central Government for banning J&K JeI are not plausible, at all,' he said, adding that the people in Kashmir feel that banning JeI will cause further unrest on ground and worsen the situation.

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.