December 13, 2024 09:12 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress always prioritised personal interest over Constitution: Rajnath Singh | Jaishankar calls attack on Hindus in Bangladesh 'a source of concern' | Allu Arjun arrested over woman's death in stampede during Pushpa 2 premiere show | RBI receives bomb threat in Russian language, case filed | UP teenager kills mother, lives with body for 5 days | At least six people including a child killed in Tamil Nadu hospital fire | Amid Atul Subhash row, SC says mere harassment is not enough to prove abetment to suicide | India's D Gukesh becomes youngest ever world champion in chess | Devendra Fadnavis meets PM Modi amid suspense over Maharashtra portfolio allocation | Congress wants to deviate the issue of Sonia Gandhi-George Soros link: JP Nadda
Sanatana Dharma
Photo courtesy: X/Udhayanidhi Stalin

Giving some relief, court dismisses petition against Udhayanidhi Stalin over 'Sanatana' remarks

| @@indiablooms | Mar 07, 2024, at 04:41 am

Days after the Supreme Court pulled him for his remarks on Sanatana Dharma, DMK minister Udhayanidhi Stalin Wednesday got some relief from the Madras High Court. 

The court has dismissed a petition that challenged the continuation of Stalin and two other DMK leaders as legislators.

The high court observed that Stalin's remarks were "wrong", but noted that he had not been convicted by any court yet.

The 46-year-old DMK leader, who is the son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, had made the controversial remarks on Sanatana Dharma last September.

The remarks, in which he said "Sanatana is like malaria and dengue and must be eradicated", had sparked a massive row.

Besides Udhayanidhi Stalin, the petitioners had sought the removal of state minister PK Sekar Babu and DMK MP A Raja from the Assembly as Babu was present when Udhayanidhi made the remark and Raja had endorsed what he said.

Doubling down on his remarks, Stalin said he had targeted caste-based discrimination and not Hinduism. He has also said he is prepared to face legal action, but he stands by his remarks.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.