March 12, 2026 11:22 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
America’s flip-flop on Russian oil: How Washington sends conflicting signals to India | Big diplomatic win! Iran allows Indian oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz | ‘It was over in the first hour’: Trump declares victory in Iran war, says ‘nothing left to target’ | Indian-origin shopkeepers face targeted attacks in Wembley; Somali men suspected | Iran pulls out of 2026 FIFA World Cup amid war with US-Israel | Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals
Book Row
The circulation and ordered seizure of NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbooks banned over a controversial chapter on the judiciary. Representational photo by ChatGPT

'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban

| @indiablooms | Mar 10, 2026, at 01:51 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on Tuesday issued an unconditional apology over a now-banned controversial chapter on judicial corruption in a Class 8 Social Science textbook.

The council withdrew the book two weeks after the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its reprinting and online circulation.

In an official statement posted on X, NCERT said: “The Director and Members of NCERT hereby tender an unconditional and unqualified apology for Chapter IV. The entire book has been withdrawn and is not available.

“We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused and appreciate the understanding of all stakeholders. NCERT remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, sensitivity, and responsibility in educational content.”

The top court had expressed dissatisfaction with NCERT’s initial response, noting the absence of a clear apology. The ban followed a suo motu case concerning the chapter titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society.”

During the hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant sought accountability from both the central government and NCERT, warning that the matter would not be closed until those responsible were identified.

The court also directed authorities to seize all existing copies of the textbook and issued notices to the Centre and NCERT Chairman Professor Dinesh Prasad Saklani.

The Chief Justice remarked sharply on the seriousness of the issue, stating it affected the credibility and integrity of the judiciary, and stressed that “…heads must roll! We won’t close the case.”

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, representing NCERT, faced strong observations from the bench regarding the circumstances that led to the inclusion of the controversial content.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.