September 25, 2026 11:09 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report

Arms Act Case: Jodhpur court rejects Salman's plea of witness re-examination

| | May 14, 2015, at 11:03 pm
Mumbai, May 14 (IBNS): In another blow for Bollywood actor Salman Khan, a Jodhpur court on Thursday rejected his plea for witness re-examination in connection with the 1998 blackbuck poaching case.

The case has been booked against Khan under the Arms Act as the licenses of his weapons were found to have been expired.

On April 29, Khan pleaded 'not guilty' before the court.

He had filed for re-examination of five witnesses in the case.

Salman Khan and a few other Bollywood actors  were accused of poaching blackbucks, and endangered species, on the midnight of Oct 1-2, 1998 during the shooting of a movie "Hum Saath Saath Hain".

Two blackbucks, were killed on the outskirts of Kankani village near Jodhpur.

Khan is accused of carrying and using illegal arms.

Earlier this month, a session court convicted and sentenced him to jail for five years in connection with the 2002 incident in which his SUV mounted over pavement and ploughed through several persons, killing one and injuring four others.

The court found him guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and held him responsible for drunken driving without having a valid license.

Later, the Bombay High Court suspended his five-year jail sentence and asked him  to apply for bail with a bond of Rs. 30,000.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.