April 16, 2026 07:42 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping

50 persons of a single family not listed in Assam NRC

| @indiablooms | Sep 01, 2019, at 06:29 pm

Guwahati, Sept 1 (IBNS): Not only one, two, three or five, a total of 50 persons of a single family have been excluded from the final National Register of Citizens (NRC), which was published on Aug 31.

The list excluded 19 lakh people.

A 52-year-old Ahmad Hussain,  a primary school teacher and his entire family members, including at least 15 children, were left out from the final NRC list.

Ahmad Hussain and his family members, including 7 brothers, are living at Nichanchar village under Baghbor assembly constituency in Assam’s Barpeta district.

Interestingly, the entire family, excluding a brother of Ahmad Hussain, was included in the earlier draft NRC list, but they were left out from the final NRC.

The excluded person from the earlier draft NRC was Abdul Baten – one brother of Ahmad Hussain.

When the NRC authority served hearing notice to Abdul Baten, he had used 1966 legacy data of late Harmuj Ali Bhuyan.

Ahmad Hussain doubted that the difference of the legacy data of 1951 and 1966 is the main reason for it.

The entire family is now worried after their names were not listed in the final NRC list.

“We have found that, not a single member of our family listed in the final NRC which was published yesterday. There are 50 members in our family. We had used our father’s legacy data of 1951. Our family members name were listed in the earlier draft NRC, but one of brother’s name was not included. When he applied second time, he used 1966 legacy data. For it, we were served several notices. We had appeared in hearings four times. But our names were not listed in the final NRC. We are now frustrated. We are worried about it. We will apply again following the government instructions,” Ahmad Hussain said.

 

(By Hemanta Kumar Nath, Guwahati)

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.