June 28, 2026 01:39 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected | Donald Trump gets a road named after him in India, says 'Thank You!' | Fresh setback for Gautam Adani? US judge asks DoJ to justify dropping criminal charges | Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations
BalakotStrikeCasualty

300 militants killed in India's Balakot strike in Pulwama retaliation, suggests ex-Pakistani diplomat

| @indiablooms | Jan 10, 2021, at 02:48 am

New Delhi/IBNS: In a major revelation, a former Pakistani diplomat has admitted on a television show that 300 terrorists were killed in the Balkot airstrikes by India on February 26, 2019.

According to a report by news agency ANI, Pakistani diplomat Agha Hilaly, who regularly speaks in support of Pakistani Army in TV debates, made the revelation which is a stark contrast against the zero-casualty claim made by Islamabad.

Pakistan had made the claim of zero-casualty as a face saving measure in an attempt to cover up the presence of terrorists in the area, after India bombed Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terror training camp at Balakot in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan.

After the Pulwama terror attack on February 14, 2019 in which 40 CRPF personnel lost their lives, India made the airstrikes in Balakot to avenge the death of the security personnel.

Agha Hilaly said: "India crossed the international border and did an act of war in which at least 300 were reported dead."

"Our target was different from theirs. We targeted their high command. That was our legitimate target because they are men of the military," the Pakistani diplomat was quoted as saying in the ANI report.

"We subconsciously accepted that a surgical strike -- a limited action -- did not result in any casualty. Now we have subconsciously told them that, whatever they will do, we'll do only that much and won't escalate," said Agha Hilaly.

The comments were made in a programme in Urdu channel months after Pakistan lawmaker of Muslim League-N (PML-N) Ayaz Sadiq had said in a parliament address that Pakistan Army Chief Qamar Jawed Bajwa's legs were shaking when the country's Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi told the lawmakers in a meeting February last year that India would attack if Indian Air Force Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman was not released.

“I remember Shah Mahmood Qureshi was in the meeting in which Imran Khan had refused to attend and Chief of Army Staff General Bajwa came into the room, his legs were shaking and he was perspiring. Foreign Minister said for God’s sake let Abhinandan go, India’s about to attack Pakistan at 9 PM," said Sadiq, reported Pakistan's Dunya News.

Soon after, Prime Minister Imran Khan had announced that Pakistan was releasing Wing Commander Abhinandan as a sign of “goodwill gesture”.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.