February 28, 2024 19:40 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Calcutta HC grants bail to ex-Sandeshkhali CPI(M) MLA Nirapada Sardar, raps govt over his arrest | ‘Our MSMEs have great opportunity to be part of global supply chain', says PM Modi | Indian-origin author Nitasha Kaul, who was deported over 'anti-India views', claims 'all lies' | 'How will retired district judges survive': Supreme Court questions Centre on pension amount | Cross-border terrorism emerging from Pakistan being given befitting response: S Jaishankar
Sedition law colonial, why don't you take it off the statute book? SC asks Centre Sedition

Sedition law colonial, why don't you take it off the statute book? SC asks Centre

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 15 Jul 2021, 02:02 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the central government why it does not drop the "colonial" sedition law, which it feels is enormously "misused", media reports said.

Chief Justice NV Ramana said as quoted by NDTV, "The sedition law is a colonial law. Do we still need the law in our country after 75 years of Independence."

The CJI has questioned the Centre why it is not taking it off the statute book while it has done the same with many others.

A three-judge bench headed by the CJI said, "There is enormous misuse. The use of sedition is like giving a saw to the carpenter to cut a piece of wood and he uses it to cut the entire forest itself. That is the effect of this law."

"If a police officer wants to fix anybody in a village for something, he can use Section 124 A... People are scared," it added.

The court has said it would examine the law and asked the Centre to respond to the petition filed by former Army officer Major-General (Retd) SG Vombatkere, who says the law is an unreasonable restriction on free expression.

"Our concern is misuse of the law and no accountability of the executive," the CJI told Attorney General KK Venugopal, who has suggested the retention of the law with "guidelines".

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.