November 14, 2026 06:09 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Microsoft outage finally over! Outlook, Teams and Copilot restored after 24-hour global disruption | India seeks security, fair trial guarantees before Sheikh Hasina’s return to Bangladesh: Report | ‘PM doesn't do that’: Sam Pitroda contradicts Rahul Gandhi's phone-tapping claim against Modi | ‘Visa matters are sovereign functions’: MEA responds to Norwegian journalist Helle Lyng's India entry row | 23 killed as speeding mini-bus collides head-on with truck in Assam’s Kaziranga | Indonesian woman posing as Kolkata resident caught with fake Aadhaar, voter ID at India-Nepal border | Centre delivers fresh blow to Zakir Naik, extends IRF ban by five years | 'A piece of sh*t': Shocking details emerge from Jensen Huang's final hours as Nvidia CEO | Microsoft outage disrupts businesses worldwide; Air India, IndiGo issue customer alerts | Owaisi, Chandrashekhar Azad join hands to challenge BJP in 2027 UP elections

Amid row, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Dinesh Maheshwari elevated to SC

| @indiablooms | Jan 16, 2019, at 08:53 pm

New Delhi, Jan 16 (IBNS): Amid row over their appointments, the Centre on Wednesday elevated Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, Dinesh Maheshwari, and Delhi High Court Judge, Sanjiv Khanna, to the Supreme Court, media reports said.

After getting cleared, the recommendations made by the Collegium have been signed off by President Ram Nath Kovind.

Controversy:

The controversy erupted after a section of former judges and lawyers opined that the Collegium had dropped two different names before making the fresh recommendations.

It also said Justice Maheshwari was not considered to be elevated in the meeting of the Collegium but was later named abruptly.

Justice Khanna's name was also dragged into controversy as he is said to be the number 33 in the All India Seniority list of the HC judges.

Former Delhi High Court Judge Kailash Gambhir had written a letter to the President saying that superceding 32 senior judges would mark a "black day" in the judiciary history of the country.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.