March 07, 2026 11:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Sensex, Nifty tumble as global tensions and Dow selloff rattle Indian markets | Two IAF pilots killed as Su-30MKI fighter jet crashes in Assam | 'Who is the US to permit?': Congress slams Modi govt over Trump administration’s waiver on India’s Russian oil purchase | US makes surprise move: India gets 30-day waiver to buy Russian oil amid global supply crisis | India edge England by 7 runs in thriller to reach T20 World Cup 2026 final | 'Guest of India struck in international waters': Iran furious after US submarine torpedoes IRIS Dena | Bihar's 'Susashan Babu' Nitish Kumar announces exit as CM, set for Rajya Sabha debut | ‘Baseless’: India rejects claims US used its ports to strike Iran | Defiant silence: Iran women’s team refuses anthem days after Khamenei’s death | 'You’ll find out soon': Trump hints at massive retaliation after Riyadh attack, says ‘boots on ground’ may not be needed

Greenpeace urges TGBL to commit to a holistic approach that helps eliminate pesticides from tea

| | Sep 12, 2014, at 03:13 am
New Delhi, Sept 11 (IBNS): Weeks after Greenpeace released its report "Trouble Brewing" highlighting the presence of toxic pesticide residues in tea, the tea industry remains divided on the issue.
Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) demonstrated their commitment to consumer safety and took the lead in announcing Non-Pesticide Management pilots as a first step to completely phase out pesticides from tea, Greenpeace said in a statement.
 
"TGBL on the other hand is committed to an approach of reducing pesticide usage in tea which will not guarantee a phase out of pesticides from tea," it said.
 
Greenpeace had shared the findings of its research with all the companies before releasing the report and has been engaging with the companies since then. 
 
As a result of this, companies like HUL and Girnar publicly announced an approach to phase out pesticides from their supply chain, whereas TGBL, another market leader, advocated for reduction in pesticides use. 
 
Greenpeace India finds this reductionist approach inadequate as it will not help the tea industry move out of the pesticides treadmill.
 
“We have communicated to TGBL that their approach to address the pesticide menace in tea cultivation is not enough, but so far we have not heard back from them. This poses a huge question on their commitment to consumer safety, “said Neha Saigal, Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace India. 
 
She further stated that substitution based approaches are not the answer; the need of the hour is a holistic ecosystem based approach that tea companies must adopt and advocate for.
 
Tata Global Beverages is one of the market leaders; hence the onus is on them to give consumers pesticide-free tea. Consumers associate TATA with reliability and sustainability, and they expect the company to demonstrate leadership and commit to whatever it takes to supply clean chai, said Greenpeace.
 
Greenpeace India demanded and urged TGBL to go the Unilever way and give consumers a clean cuppa.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.