July 10, 2026 09:11 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Foreign franchise league enters India! BBL opener to be played in Chennai, announce Modi-Albanese | 'They could have stopped me': Vijay blames police, former DMK government over Karur stampede | 'People will correct their 2025 mistake': Electoral debutant Prashant Kishor predicts BJP defeat in Bankipur | New assassination plot against Trump? Israel's secret intelligence raises alarm amid escalating Middle East tension | Ayatollah Ali Khamenei buried at Iran's holiest shrine as Middle East crisis deepens | Indian techie allegedly kills wife in US, sends photo of her body to 'secret girlfriend' in India; arrested | 'I fled the city': Thane doctor quits after alleged assault by Shiv Sena leader | Sensex surges 500 points before losing steam, ends marginally higher after volatile trading session | US court drops charges against Indian-origin doctor who drove Tesla off 250-foot cliff with family | Dalal Street bleeds! Sensex tanks over 1,600 points after Trump declares Iran ceasefire 'over'
Aryan Khan
Image Credit: UNI

No positive evidence against Aryan Khan, others: Bombay HC

| @indiablooms | Nov 21, 2021, at 03:35 am

Mumbai/UNI: The Bombay High Court has held that there was no positive evidence against Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan's son Aryan Khan and co-accused Munmun Dhamecha and Arbaaz Merchant, who were arrested last month after the Narcotic Control Bureau raided a Goa-bound ship off the coast of Mumbai and seized banned drugs.

In a detailed 14-page order, which was delivered by Justice Nitin Sambre and was uploaded on the website of Bombay High Court today, the court observed that “no prima facie evidence” against the trio were found in relation to the charges of ‘conspiracy’ and ‘common intent’ in the case.

On October 28, the court granted conditional bail to Khan, Dhamecha and Merchant through an operative order and said that a detailed order will be delivered later.

In its order, Justice Sambre said that NCB's claim on the common intention to commit an offence under the NDPS Act, (accused) found to be in possession of commercial quantity of drugs and hatching conspiracy is "liable to be rejected".

The court said that merely because the accused were travelling on the cruise cannot be grounds to invoke the offence under Section 29 (criminal conspiracy) against them.

"This court is required to be sensitive to the fact that there has to be a presence of basic material in the form of evidence so as to substantiate the case of conspiracy against the applicants (accused)," Justice Sambre noted.

He further said that no drugs were found on Khan, while the quantity recovered from Dhamecha and Merchant was 'small' under the NDPS Act

Under such circumstances, in order to invoke the offence of conspiracy against the accused, there has to be positive evidence about an agreement to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act by unlawful means, and such agreement must precede with a meeting of minds, but there is no such material, in this case, the court observed.

Justice Sambre said that the probe to date suggested that the accused trio were travelling independently and there was no ‘meeting of minds’ on the issue, as contended by the NCB.

Accordingly, since there was no offence of conspiracy, the rigours of NDPS Act Section 37 on grant of bail would not apply here, the court said, granting bail to Khan, Dhamecha and Merchant last month.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.